[narby]

I haven't even looked at his "math", If it's what I think it is, radomly trying to find a specific sequence, that's not even the correct way to approach the problem of abiogenesis. It's a wildly parallel process, and doesn't not have a specific sequence goal to ignite abiogenesis. All it has to be is anything that can self reproduce and mutate, and that launches Evolution.

Which Sadsack doesn't even understand.

[anguish]

It's a wildly parallel processs, and doesn't not have a specific sequence goal to ignite abiogenesis

Of course, but it would nevertheless be interesting to see how he got to his conclusion. Especially as it involves data that would hand him the Nobel prize instantly if he had them.