Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blurblogger
In my reference to burn/size/gravitational pull I cited a physics argument against an old earth.

You demand a scientific answer, yet you cannot provide one link to a scientific institution that supports your outrageous claims? The notion that all we know about astronomy, biology, archeology, paleontology, geology... is wrong would warrant a little attention from the scientific community, don't you think? In which case there would be tons of articles and papers on it, so you should be able to provide us with at least one link to an actual science institution that even mentions this fantastic idea of yours.... I won't hold my breath.
42 posted on 01/22/2005 10:01:21 AM PST by Alacarte (There is no knowledge that is not power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Alacarte

you should be able to provide us with at least one link to an actual science institution that even mentions this fantastic idea of yours.... I won't hold my breath.

BREATHE.

Regarding the huge old-earth sun and its larger gravitational pull that would suck planets into it--

That is my own hypothesis, not one I've ever noted elsewhere. Newton didn't have a bunch of white papers to point his skeptics to, nor did our historical friends who denounced the flat-earthers. Can you refute--or do you just sit with your mouse eagerly seeking to take pot shots at I who dare create your cognitive dissonance by citing somebody who agrees with you?


57 posted on 01/22/2005 10:19:18 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (AHEM Useful Idiots: YOU are the REDS. You and your Red-Stream Media. True America is BLUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson