Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nasamn777
Who is to say that our current value of "c" is the same as at the beginning? Could it be that C(to) = 1e10 * C(t2005)

No, there is no evidence for your proposition, and substantial evidence against it.

1,033 posted on 01/26/2005 7:15:05 AM PST by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1032 | View Replies ]


To: Thatcherite

Perhaps you could provide some evidence against this proposition.

Here is a possible equation for the speed of light:

c(t) = 2.9979e18*e^(-4.60517e-4 * t) [m/s]

where t is in years


1,034 posted on 01/26/2005 7:34:18 AM PST by nasamn777 (The emperor wears no clothes -- I am sorry to tell you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1033 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson