To: Soul Seeker
thankfully we now know where Noonan and Buckley stand.
They didn't like the speech. What else do you think this says about them?
To: Stone Mountain
They didn't like the speech. What else do you think this says about them?
It's not simply that they didn't like the speech. It's the fact that they felt so compelled to pontificate publicly about how they didn't like the speech. I expect the Dems to immediately rain on W's parade, but what drove these two to do it so quickly?
140 posted on
01/21/2005 1:47:26 PM PST by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
To: Stone Mountain
Simply, their view of the world and what they choose to focus on.
Overreaching, impossible to achieve, focus on syntax over substance, questionable opinion of the 'proper' invocation of God.
While others are firmly convicted that freedom cannot be restrained, that it is the right of every human being to experience the freedom granted by our Creator. They aren't caught up in syntax but in the universal themes that have the potential to bear our repeat revolutions for freedom throughout generations.
One is cautionary, one is visionary. I'll take the revolutionary over the professor.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson