Skip to comments.
Heresy Case Pressed Against Kerry, Others
WorldNet Daily ^
| 21 January 2005
| NA
Posted on 01/21/2005 7:14:56 AM PST by Mershon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: mike182d
Jesus didn't come for the righteous but the sinners.Amen.
41
posted on
01/21/2005 9:37:54 AM PST
by
John123
(Good grief! The Palestinians cannot even organize a state funeral!)
To: mike182d
Although, I just figured that the seperation of Church (Institutions not religion in general) and State would be compromised if clergy held offices within the government - there'd be a conflict of interest.
Separation of Church and State mandates that Clergy CAN hold office if they so choose. The Catholic Church does not normally permit Clergy to hold elective office, but that decision is made at the Local Ordinary's (Bishop's) level, IIRC.
This is a Church lawsuit, that risks a judgment of excommunication or a declaration that a excommunication has already taken place, or perhaps something else. You can be excommunicated by declaration of the Church, or by yourself by heinous actions. The Former usually requires a formal action to remove it, the latter usually requires the action of a Bishop, who normally allows Priests the faculties to remove such a sentence. Sometimes it is reserved to the Holy See which means Only Rome can reconcile that individual.
This is the application of Canon Law (CIC Canon 1398) also stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 2272):
2272: "Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae, by the very commission of the offense, and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law.
The term "latae sententiae" means the individual has broken themselves from the Church, and no further action is required from the Church, but that also does not exclude such action. Searching "CCC 2272" will yield more than you wanted to know on google.
42
posted on
01/21/2005 10:08:33 AM PST
by
Dominick
("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
To: Dominick
Thank you very much for the clarification :-)
43
posted on
01/21/2005 10:43:47 AM PST
by
mike182d
To: Mershon; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
Catholic Ping - please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
44
posted on
01/21/2005 11:19:54 AM PST
by
NYer
("In good times we enjoy faith, in bad times we exercise faith." ... Mother Angelica)
To: Mershon
It's about time, that's all I can say.
Either The Church "IS" or She is irrelevant.
45
posted on
01/21/2005 12:09:07 PM PST
by
HighlyOpinionated
(I was at the 55th Presidential Inauguration -- 01/20/2005!)
To: NorCalRepub
Kerry loves abortion and abortion dollars.
End of story.
To: NorCalRepub
well.......i guess you have a point.......I guess I get upset that sometimes this stuff seems so over the top until we do it then it seems reasonable..... This is the Catholic Church -non-partisan... Unless you are Catholic there is no we unless you are affiliated with them e.g. dems...
47
posted on
01/21/2005 2:23:45 PM PST
by
DBeers
To: DBeers
you read out of context......in that sentence I was referring to lawsuits, not abortions
To: NorCalRepub
but I never heard him say "I'm pro abortion".... He sounded pretty enthusiastic about it when he addressed NARAL, campaigning last spring.
49
posted on
01/21/2005 2:39:20 PM PST
by
maryz
To: NYer
Kerry and the rest of them don't care what the Church says.
To: NorCalRepub
you read out of context......in that sentence I was referring to lawsuits, not abortions How dare you accuse ME of reading out of context!!!!
/end humor
51
posted on
01/21/2005 3:43:56 PM PST
by
DBeers
To: Mershon
Daring to discipline (On excommunication of pro-choice Catholic pols)Vatican: Kerry guilty of heresy; incurrs automatic excommunication
Major Developments -- Kerry Heresy Case
Denunciation of US Senator John F Kerry for Heresy.
JOHN KERRY, Kennedy, Harkin, Cuomo, Collins, Denounced for Heresy
Lawyer buoyed on Kerry 'heresy
NY TIMES: Letter Supports Anti-Kerry Bid Over Abortion (Kerry Excommunication)
DRUDGE POSTS 'MOVE TO EXCOMMUNICATE KERRY AND OTHERS ADVANCES'
Sen. John Kerry Excommunicated, According To Vatican Response
Vatican denies it responded to lawyer seeking Kerry's excommunication.
Excommunicated or Not, Kerry is not Permitted to Receive Communion
About That Whole Kerry Excommunication Thing
Heresy case pressed against Kerry, others ...
Canonical Suit Filed Against Catholic Senators Kennedy, Kerry, Collins & Mario Cuomo
Heresy Case Pressed Against Kerry, Others
52
posted on
01/21/2005 7:17:05 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Modernman
Fr. Drinan was a commie priest from Mass. (like there's any other kind) during the Watergate hearings. He had a prominent committee position in the House of Representaives, and was, of course, a Democrat. He made a lot of noise during the last days of Dick (Nixon) nd was a fave of the MSM. Soon thereafter, the Vatican banned priests from holding office in a similar fashion (I'm not sure of the specifics of the rule/order/bull/etc.). But anyway, 'twas the Vatican, not any American authority, who banned him. Furthermore, Jack Danforth, an Episcopal priest (perhaps the last straight white male to hold such a position) was a Senator from Missouri for quite a while. Nevermind every Rev.-Rep. in the Congressional Black Caucus.
53
posted on
01/22/2005 6:25:02 PM PST
by
BroncosFan
("It's worse than a crime - it's a mistake." Talleyrand.)
To: Modernman; BroncosFan
That is not true. Any such law would be unconstitutional.
Correct. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the Constitutional provision prohibiting a religious test for holders of public office, as well as the first amendment, is due in part to the first Archbishop of Baltimore (the premier diocese in the U.S.A.),
John Carroll:
He represented to Congress the need of a constitutional provision for the protection and maintenance of religious liberty, and doubtless to him, in part, is due the provision in Article Sixth, Section 3, of the Constitution, which declares that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States", and also the first amendment, passed this same year by the first Congress, that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof: (for a more cautious view see SHEA, op. cit., 348).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson