Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Now it is, 'It's still not cost effective" It will be eventually.

I certainly hope so. I've been looking for a while on the actual cost numbers, and have to admit that I was a little disappointed to see that it was so high on an incremental basis -- if that number factored in the infrastructure cost, it might not be too bad, but as a per-unit cost, it's a bit concerning.

As beneficial as this technology is, I doubt it will make significant headway unless it can operate at a profit. Hopefully they'll continue to improve the process to make it more cost efficient now that the technological concept appears to have been borne out on a reasonable scale.

13 posted on 01/21/2005 11:21:24 AM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom

Give it time. It has overcome many of the hurdles that many thought were impossible to overcome.

Look at it this way, how many people have come on this thread to say the technology is a "boondoggle" or another example of "cold fusion"? The technology has proven itself, now the proper application and development needs to be fine tuned.

I had hopes for a source of oil production with this technology. Now I realize that oil production is just a side benefit and the real use of this technology will be in the waste management field.

You know all of those used tire yards? Gone with a plant like this. You know those nasty landfills? Build a plant nearby and ship it in for proper disposal.


15 posted on 01/21/2005 11:28:40 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson