Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Powell to resign (FCC)
Reuters | 20-01-2005 | Reuters

Posted on 01/21/2005 6:30:52 AM PST by 12B

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 01/21/2005 6:30:53 AM PST by 12B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 12B

GOOD!


2 posted on 01/21/2005 6:31:31 AM PST by Glenn (The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

I agree.


3 posted on 01/21/2005 6:32:06 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 12B

Maybe now they can find someone who will actually do their job instead of being afraid of the mass media corporations and advertisers.


4 posted on 01/21/2005 6:32:25 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 12B; bert; Peacerose; Landru
Michael Powell to resign (FCC)

Might be interesting to see in what direction "W" goes with this...

FGS

5 posted on 01/21/2005 6:40:20 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Honestly the FCC has no effect on my life what so ever so I say "EH" to this news.


6 posted on 01/21/2005 6:41:30 AM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
"Might be interesting to see in what direction "W" goes with this..."

Yea.

...or infuriating, disappointing etc ad infinitum.

7 posted on 01/21/2005 6:59:46 AM PST by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 12B

That's nice to hear, but it would be better if the whole damn thing went away.

In the meantime though I'll take it.

Thanks for the heads-up.


8 posted on 01/21/2005 7:17:43 AM PST by Gefreiter (When seconds count, the police are minutes away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 12B
Well since the other thread got yanked.......... I watched an Interview w/ him on Tech-TV once. It was very good, one of the best interviews of him I've seen.
9 posted on 01/21/2005 7:20:04 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 12B

I am glad to see him go. It took a public outcry for him to start doing his job. Hopefully we can get someone who will protect morality on the airwaves, without being subjected to the anger of the masses.


10 posted on 01/21/2005 7:27:08 AM PST by Sensei Ern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: 12B

How about replacing him with Bernard Goldberg?


12 posted on 01/21/2005 7:34:02 AM PST by Buck W. (How can anyone who works for a living vote democrat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Landru
...or infuriating, disappointing etc ad infinitum.

Then again, "W" might ask himself, "Now just what is it you people are here for?" What're the odds???

Yeah, yeah ;^)

FGS

13 posted on 01/21/2005 8:09:38 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 12B
>Michael Powell to resign (FCC)

Is this more fall out
from the, er, fall out? What a
way to lose your job . . .











14 posted on 01/21/2005 8:15:05 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
Might be interesting to see in what direction "W" goes with this...

Kevin Martin would be the best choice to replace Powell.

Even to a casual observer of the Commission, it certainly appears that Powell was asked to step down by the White House. He didn't jump, he was pushed.

Powell was originally appointed to the FCC by Clinton.

15 posted on 01/21/2005 8:19:57 AM PST by HAL9000 (Spreading terrorist beheading propaganda videos is an Act of Treason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sensei Ern

"I am glad to see him go. It took a public outcry for him to start doing his job. Hopefully we can get someone who will protect morality on the airwaves, without being subjected to the anger of the masses."

I'd prefer they stuck to frequency allocation and let market forces shape content decisions.

The FCC didn't make the biggest impact about Janet Jacksons wardrobe malfunction for example - viewers did.


16 posted on 01/21/2005 8:29:43 AM PST by adam_az (UN out of the US! - http://www.moveamericaforward.org/?Page=Petition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bullseye876
As far as the content, let the courts decide whether one can see and hear sh*t, *u**, m*th*rf***er, *i**, *o*k*u*ker etc.

Subjects of which would ultimately end up at SCOTUS where precedent would be a prickly problem. No two violations are exactly the same???

IMO, there's a larger question, that is, do we as a society/culture have the right to condemn and restrict certain behaviors?

FGS

17 posted on 01/21/2005 8:32:20 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Kevin Martin would be the best choice to replace Powell.

He gets my vote.

The larger problem is the BLOATED bureaucracy generally; overstepping, overreaching and increasing encroachment into our daily lives. What SHOULD their charter and/or mission statement be? Where should "WE the People" engage this problem?

Even to a casual observer of the Commission, it certainly appears that Powell was asked to step down by the White House. He didn't jump, he was pushed.

I expect you're right about this.

FGS

18 posted on 01/21/2005 8:46:50 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
>I'd prefer they stuck to frequency allocation and let market forces shape content decisions. The FCC didn't make the biggest impact about Janet Jacksons wardrobe malfunction for example - viewers did

Sounds like it makes sense,
but if you think about it,
I'm not sure it does.

There have been always
viewers who complain. For some
internal reason,

big name media
have been giving complainers
air time recently.

I do not believe
these are real "market forces"
at work here because

media people
will tell you offended folks
are always present . . .

19 posted on 01/21/2005 8:47:47 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Where should "WE the People" engage this problem?

I was getting ahead of myself. The problem I refer to is "smut" on the streets, on the air, and in your face.

FGS

20 posted on 01/21/2005 8:50:47 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson