Skip to comments.
AP: Bush Starts New Term, Seeks End to Tyranny
AP on Yahoo ^
| 1/20/05
| Terence Hunt - AP
Posted on 01/20/2005 3:29:18 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Some, seeing that headline, would assume Bush is pledging to end tyranny in his own administration.
2
posted on
01/20/2005 3:30:45 PM PST
by
My2Cents
To: NormsRevenge
He said U.S. efforts have lit "a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power,
it burns those who fight its progress and one day this untamed fire of freedom will reach the darkest corners of our world."
Tiny Tommy felt the fire in November. ;-)
3
posted on
01/20/2005 3:31:13 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
To: NormsRevenge
Even AP headline writers get it right sometime.
4
posted on
01/20/2005 3:34:12 PM PST
by
Momaw Nadon
("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
To: NormsRevenge
"Personally, I don't feel much like celebrating," said House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California. "So I'm going to mark the occasion by pledging to do everything in my power to fight the extremist Republican's destructive agenda." Is that the most gracious thing this shriveled up old bag of hate could come up with?
5
posted on
01/20/2005 3:34:54 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: NormsRevenge
President Bush is following in the footsteps of The Great Ronald Reagan.
President Reagan freed millions from the shackles of communism. President Bush is taking the next step.
God bless them both.
6
posted on
01/20/2005 3:36:20 PM PST
by
Aussie Dasher
(Stop Hillary - PEGGY NOONAN '08)
To: NormsRevenge
IMO, President Bush was telling us that he intended to expand the War on Terror in the Middle East.
He was telling us to buckle up. Geesh!
He didn't talk about domestic issues or budgetary issues or securing or borders. He talked about how important it is that freedom is extended to everybody no matter in what country.
7
posted on
01/20/2005 3:37:28 PM PST
by
DCPatriot
(I don't do politically correct very well either.)
To: NormsRevenge
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, 80 years old and frail with thyroid cancer, administered the oath I'll really like to see the commiecRATs reaction in four years when
Chief Justice Thomas administers the oath to President Elect Condi Rice.
8
posted on
01/20/2005 3:38:45 PM PST
by
ASA Vet
(I issue a MEJI report on all Trolls.)
To: NormsRevenge

Nuthing but Luhv for the W.
9
posted on
01/20/2005 3:47:08 PM PST
by
KMC1
To: NormsRevenge
William Jefferson Clinton had the opportunity to cut terrorism off at the knees but he Muffed it.
10
posted on
01/20/2005 3:47:56 PM PST
by
Ibredd
To: DCPatriot
He didnt mention those things because he spoke of his agenda honestly and truthfully.
11
posted on
01/20/2005 3:50:03 PM PST
by
stopem
To: KMC1
Amen! Long Live the Pax Americana!
To: NormsRevenge
Poor old embittered Nancy Pelosi could hide her hate for even one day. She is truly pathetic. I only wish she and Ted Kennedy were single so they could marry each other, they certainly deserve each other.Two peas in a pod.
To: NormsRevenge
AP: Bush Starts New Term, Seeks End to Tyranny
They left off the rest ... AP: Bush Starts New Term, Seeks End to Tyranny and Old Media! :)
To: DCPatriot
"He didn't talk about domestic issues or budgetary issues or securing or borders. He talked about how important it is that freedom is extended to everybody no matter in what country."He did mention some domestic issues (abortion/ownership society) but the thrust was battling radical Islamism. He didn't, however, indicate that it would be at the tip of a sword. W told the Iranian people to rise up, the Iraqis to fight their own battles in time and the rest of the tyrants to mark their time. Statecraft will be used as will Warcraft. W will not do things precipitously. He has shown that...
15
posted on
01/20/2005 4:06:03 PM PST
by
eureka!
(It will not be safe to vote Democrat for a long, long, time...)
To: DCPatriot
He didn't talk about domestic issues or budgetary issues or securing or borders. He talked about how important it is that freedom is extended to everybody no matter in what country.He will probably talk about that in his address to the nation speech
16
posted on
01/20/2005 4:06:54 PM PST
by
Kaslin
To: Aussie Dasher
Is it really realistic to end tyranny in the world as we know it? Sounds a bit utopian to me. Perhaps I am misunderstanding his words.
To: Zack Nguyen
It's all about aiming high.
The more he aims for, the more he will achieve.
18
posted on
01/20/2005 4:12:02 PM PST
by
Aussie Dasher
(Stop Hillary - PEGGY NOONAN '08)
To: Zack Nguyen
Although it is not realistic to think that tyranny will be ended (at least until the second coming)it is a goal worth pursuing and one which I believe we are all obligated to work and pray for.
19
posted on
01/20/2005 4:14:45 PM PST
by
GrannyML
To: Zack Nguyen
"Is it really realistic to end tyranny in the world as we know it? Sounds a bit utopian to me. Perhaps I am misunderstanding his words." Would you like it to go the other way?
20
posted on
01/20/2005 4:21:42 PM PST
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson