You are aware that the journal withdrew the article, and Dr. Meyer is no longer associated with the journal?
You are aware that Dr. Meyer was an editor, and used his authority to publish the article without an actual review by people competent to judge it?
You are aware that those who did review it disagreed with its conclusions?
I have no idea. I just reposted it as a favor to someone that said he had formatting problems. I didn't even read it.
I believe you are mistaken. We've been over this a ton of times. The paper was reviewed by more than one person; all with Ph.D.'s. It followed the same process as the other papers. The only reason the Journal distanced itself was because the evo's went ape-**** and caused a firestorm. You better get your facts straight - I'm sure Dr. Meyer wouldn't appreciate you concocting a just-so story at his expense.