Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laredo44; GarySpFc

"If the Inquisitors had had you, the sun would still be revolving around the earth."


It's really so sad that God-haters can be so easily baited.

I entreat you to read the posts on this and similar threads and then tell me whose comments are the more irrational and threatening: the ones from your side of the issue or the ones from the other side of the issue.

You guys sound precisely like liberals, you know that? Name calling, invective, ad-hominem attacks just like what you said to me are all common feature from your side's posts.

If you are offended by my baiting then I can only assume that you see yourself as in the group of Psychotically enraged Darwinist-atheist-antiChristians and are duly offended at truth in labeling.

Considering you are the only one to respond to my bait I'm left to conclude the other folks on your side are, at least so far, demonstrably more rational.

So, care to rationally discuss the issue at hand or do I continue my battle of wits with an unarmed person?


157 posted on 01/20/2005 3:12:49 PM PST by PeterFinn (The only thing I need to know about Islam is how to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: PeterFinn
You guys sound precisely like liberals, you know that? Name calling, invective, ad-hominem attacks just like what you said to me are all common feature from your side's posts.

You make the above accusation when your post #3 stated, in to to,

Psychotically enraged Darwinist-atheist-antiChristian response to follow.

It's really so sad that God-haters can be so easily baited.

Who's a "God-hater"? Not me. Read your own tagline before you go around tossing stones.

Considering you are the only one to respond to my bait I'm left to conclude the other folks on your side are, at least so far, demonstrably more rational.

You throw a "first punch" then imply the guy the responds is the pugilist? Your definition of rational is, to say the least, bizarre.

So, care to rationally discuss the issue at hand or do I continue my battle of wits with an unarmed person?

So, care to rationally discuss the issue at hand or do I continue my battle of wits with as unarmed person? Just thought I should correct your typo.

328 posted on 01/21/2005 4:54:43 AM PST by laredo44 (Liberty is not the problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson