If someone can cite paragraph and sentence in the UN's Convention on the Law of the Sea, that guarantees "Joining the convention will advance the interests of the United States military," I'd like to see it.
I'd also like to see that this treaty "will gain economic and resource benefits from the convention." Again, cite paragraph and verse.
Finally, cite paragraph and verse that guarantees this - "And the United Nations has no decision-making role under the convention in regulating uses of the oceans by any state party to the convention."
I anxiously await an answer...
Let's set the whole ball of wax out and examine it.
If President George Bush is supporting this stupid-ass UN treaty, he's no friend of the sovereignty of the United States or we the citizens.
Now I can understand that he supports his "one world order" father. But he represents the American people, not his father.
The president needs to make a choice - the American people or his father's "one world order" friends.
Let's see what happens.
In conclusion, let me say that Ms. Rice should be thrown in foxhole with communist bullets zinging over her head and praying that one of them doesn't blow her head or pretty make-up off.
I'm not trying to be cruel, but this female does not understand the utterly vicious philosophy of the UN and its hooray section that cheers the death of millions. Rwanda and Cambodia are two examples. I can name a dozen more.
The fact that she supports LOST indicates that Ms. Rice has a serious vacuum or lack of principles in her head.