To: AuH2ORepublican
But does Frist blow through the "Anonymous Hold" or even just a regular "Hold" that some Senator (obviously a Dim) would use?
61 posted on
01/19/2005 2:05:41 PM PST by
fidelio
To: fidelio
"But does Frist blow through the "Anonymous Hold" or even just a regular "Hold" that some Senator (obviously a Dim) would use?"
You bet. You can't let Senators place "holds" on a Secretary of State nominee. A district judge in the Senator's home state, that I can understand, at least as a temporary hold. But Condi's nomination already cleared the Foreign Relations Committee, and the President's diplomatic relations with foreign governments cannot be put on hold because one Senator from the minority party wants to keep the Senate from voting.
72 posted on
01/19/2005 2:16:25 PM PST by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: fidelio
But does Frist blow through the "Anonymous Hold" or even just a regular "Hold" that some Senator (obviously a Dim) would use?
Where are getting your info about a 'hold' being placed upon the confirmation vote?..... It's not a hold but a request to conduct floor debate.... The Senate by it's very nature/rules does very little without unamious consent. Thus the democrats didn't agree to a vote immediately but rather wanted debate time. They'll mostly likely agree to some number of hours for debate and then the vote will be held..
101 posted on
01/19/2005 3:29:08 PM PST by
deport
(It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson