Senior Inquirer Editors Beg Subscribers To ReturnMany Quit After 21 Reasons To Elect Kerry

County Press (Suburban Phila.) Second Thoughts ^ | 1-19-05 | William W. Lawrence

[Temple Owl]

There are far more than 21 reasons to dump the Left-wing Inquirer

[Temple Owl]

ping

[Dr. Scarpetta]

I won't subscribe to the Morning Call in Allentown either. They're liberals and refused to publish my letters to the editor.

[monday]

It's pretty funny, them having to beg subscribers to come back. nah, nah, na nah, nah....

[lilylangtree]

After stuffing 21 reasons to elect skerry down the subscribers throat, perhaps these people wised up.

[MoodyBlu]

Even when it's available to be read for free at work, I will not touch the Inquirer. It's the same thing day after day.

Philly deserves the Inquirer just as they deserve John Street. F'em, and I don't swear!

MoodyBlu

[ReadyNow]

It appears that the Inquirer's movers and shakers can not even perceive their own bias.

Absolutely wrong. They perceive it very well; they just continue to lie about it. This is a standard liberal / socialist / communist / Marxist technique.

[rwa265]

Perhaps the Inquirer should have done some inquiring before publishing those editorials.

[uncbob]

I get at least 4 calls a year asking me to take a weeks free deliveries

I always tell them you couldn't pay me to take your left wing rag

[Temple Owl]

After stuffing 21 reasons to elect Kerry down the subscribers throat, perhaps these people wised up.

You'd think so, but they obviously did not. I still find it hard to believe that they are so callous that they'd hire Anne Gordon, a Clinton fund raiser as their managing editor.

[N. Theknow]

The Times quoted Ms. Bennett as saying, "If the people I call say, 'Yes, I was mad at your editorial,' then the next thing I say is, 'Would you like to come in and talk about it?'" Ms. Bennett said.

That's like a dog crapping on the rug, not bothering to clean it up and telling his master he would like to talk about it.

[Temple Owl]

That's like a dog crapping on the rug, not bothering to clean it up and telling his master he would like to talk about it.

Love it.

[cinives]

I was one of those subscribers who told them to "shove it" in October, and I made plain the reason why - finding left-wing editorial opinion on the front page masquerading as news.

My only problem now is finding a free copy for bird poo poo paper - it's well suited for that !!

[newsgatherer]

bump for follow up on thrusdays update.

[nicmarlo]

Evening folks....just thought you'd be interested in a great article....

What the liberals do not seem to understand is that no single group controls the news anymore. The liberals have lost their monopoly. They now have to answer to talk radio, cable news. journalists on the Internet, along with a couple of "fair and balanced" television stations and a few newspapers. The silent majority now has a voice and it is being heard loud and clear.

[nicmarlo]

great article; thanks for posting.

[Darksheare]

G'evening, pretty accurate.
Also kinda chilling in a way.
When the New York Times says you're biased in favor of Dems, there's a problem.

[Bob]

When the New York Times says you're biased in favor of Dems, there's a problem.

Maybe the Times is just jealous that they haven't been able to keep up with them.

[nicmarlo]

I hadn't actually thought about how their biased has helped us pubbies get rid of trash before it infects the rest....but that's spot on, as we have observed how rotten the Rats have become, all with the complicity of the biased, liberal press.

[paudio]

The Republicans grin and get rid of the scoundrels. Thus, it helps to keep the Republican Party fairly clean. Now if it will start taking care of its readers by doing the same thing to Democrat rogues and rascals, it and America will be better off.

If they start to report negative things about the Dems, the Dems will lose even more. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.