Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: persecutor
What gets me is that in all of the years prior to 2000, the exit polls were accurate. 'Wha happened?

Actually, they have always been a bit off. Early polls had Dukakis and Reagan in a virtual tie. The "final" exit polling always has to be adjusted to "fit" the actual results, by a few percentage points. It so happens that usually, the election isn't that close so the error goes unnoticed. The last two elections, however, have been reeeal close...

45 posted on 01/19/2005 10:45:50 AM PST by Paradox (Occam was probably right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Paradox

When I say "accurate", I mean that accurate within the unscientific sample suveyed. Exit polls are horribly unscientific-one never hears what the margin of error is the things.


47 posted on 01/19/2005 10:51:11 AM PST by persecutor (Friends don't let friends vote Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox
Actually, they have always been a bit off. Early polls had Dukakis and Reagan in a virtual tie.

Wow! That's more than a bit off, I'd say. ;-)

59 posted on 01/19/2005 2:50:58 PM PST by pupdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson