Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Professor and Her Smelling Salts: Men and women are different! Cutting-edge science hits Boston.
National Review Online ^ | January 19, 2005 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 01/19/2005 8:42:39 AM PST by xsysmgr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2005 8:42:39 AM PST by xsysmgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John O

ping for later


2 posted on 01/19/2005 8:44:26 AM PST by andie74 (A Proud Resident of Fly-Over Country, a.k.a. Jesusland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

"The report, which emphasized the feelings of anonymous female professors, found that discrimination manifested itself in a "stealth-like" way at MIT — which is generally PC code for "I'm not going to provide any evidence." "

ROTF....


3 posted on 01/19/2005 8:47:16 AM PST by international american (Tagline not convinced.............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Men and women are different?

Really?


4 posted on 01/19/2005 8:47:34 AM PST by PeterFinn (The only thing I need to know about Islam is how to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

I cannot believe that I have lived all these years and not known that men and women are different.


5 posted on 01/19/2005 8:47:59 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

fainting placemarker


6 posted on 01/19/2005 8:48:24 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Jonah's right.

However, I hereby raise a very au courant issue: Anorexia and bulemia. I've wondered greatly since the 1970s as I watched an increase in these two social viruses where they may have had their origins. The feminists claim it's "evil men who demand women be thin". No, it's not. It's women demanding that women be thin. No one's got a gun to these women's heads. But "puking" at those things which offend one's so-called "sensitivities"? "Fat" is considered "offensive". So, some women puke to get rid of "fat".

And here's Hopkins, in kind, suggesting that mere words equals "actions" -- that she ingested something fatal as merely "uttered" by a speaker. Yes, of course, all this is tangental to Jonah's column -- but is it really? Perhaps the good professor Hopkins instead of puking might consider excercising her brain in ways that challenge her -- might just solve her "puke reaction". And as a role model? How many women really do get off on role modeling themselves in science and engineering fields if they gotta "puke" in thinking this translates as an intelligent response?

Dialing... Katherine MacKinnon....

7 posted on 01/19/2005 8:51:46 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

Here's a thought experiment: It's two million years ago. Eveghrtf has babies stays in the cave and takes care of them. Nancggrtf goes out hunting with the guys. Whose genes are more likely to get passed on?


8 posted on 01/19/2005 8:58:11 AM PST by ZeitgeistSurfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

I heard Rush yesterday talking to a woman that used to teach science (can't remember if it was HS or college) saying she witnessed over and over how men are more oriented to excel in science.

Alas - I have the answers for my C's in HS!!!!


9 posted on 01/19/2005 9:03:16 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
An amusing piece on this Hopkins woman from NR a few years ago: Feminist Mythology
10 posted on 01/19/2005 9:11:49 AM PST by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Lawrence Summers statement has drawn controversy all over the place on the morning talk shows. Women are outraged, too bad they can't face reality. Personally I think the man is right on! Men and women are different and the PC crowd needs to get their heads on straight.


11 posted on 01/19/2005 9:13:25 AM PST by rockabyebaby (What goes around, comes around!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby
"Men and women are different and the PC crowd needs to get their heads on straight."

Amen to that! Additionally, they need to realize that it's NOT A BAD THING that we ARE different! Good night Ned, what a freakin' boring world this would be if they were ever successful in erasing those wonderful differences!
12 posted on 01/19/2005 9:27:54 AM PST by Hegemony Cricket (Ich bin ein Pittsburgher - GO STEELERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
"When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn't breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill," Hopkins told the New York Times.

That kind of highlights the innate difference between men and women doesn't it?

13 posted on 01/19/2005 9:30:05 AM PST by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

LOL! I love NR!

"Qick, get the Smelling Salts - this lady has The Vapors! I wonder what would have happened if somebody tried to loosen her girdle?


14 posted on 01/19/2005 9:54:47 AM PST by Mongeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

One only has to look at recent development biology and even development toxicology information on the fetal brain to see clear differences in brain region/cell population development among genders.

This can be stated as scientific fact without necessarily implying any judgement as to whether one pattern is more desirable or preferable over the other.

But for a biologist to take a position that the differential brain development has no potential post-natal biological implications would require a disbelief in virtually all prior neurological research.


15 posted on 01/19/2005 9:56:21 AM PST by rod1 (uired 4 more hours).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mongeaux
"I wonder what would have happened if somebody tried to loosen her girdle?"

I assume some kind of male 'prosthetic" would fall out.

16 posted on 01/19/2005 9:57:19 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

It's feminazi women like her who make life more difficult for women like me.


17 posted on 01/19/2005 10:27:08 AM PST by fortunecookie (My grandparents didn't flee communism so that I could live in Kerry's Kommune - and I won't have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathy
men are more oriented to excel in science.

Did she clarify which branches of science? If men are more oriented to spatial and mathematical tasks, that would make them better at physics, though not biology.

18 posted on 01/19/2005 10:32:03 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
"When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn't breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill," Hopkins told the New York Times.

I remember just the other day, some mean female said that men can't really ever drive properly and I became so ill I had to curl up on the floor in a little ball and take a nap.

Then I went out and bought a new pair of shoes.

Wait...

19 posted on 01/19/2005 11:00:50 AM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs

She was speaking spatially.

Her example was water in a tube that was curved or U shaped - males in her classes could answer questions on a test about what would happen to the water levels about 80-20% (or close to) correctly compared to females. Of course in a u-shaped tube the water would be euqal on both sides regardless of the tilt of the U.

I thought is was very interesting.


20 posted on 01/19/2005 11:02:17 AM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson