Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harvard Chief Defends His Talk on Women
NY Times ^ | January 18, 2005 | SAM DILLON

Posted on 01/18/2005 3:25:24 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2005 3:25:27 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yup... keep 'em barefoot 'n pregnant !!! ;-))


2 posted on 01/18/2005 3:29:02 PM PST by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn't breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill," Dr. Hopkins said.

Here's some smelling salts, dear.

"Let's not forget that people used to say that women couldn't drive an automobile."

Prudence dictates that I refrain from comment about the abilities of women drivers.

3 posted on 01/18/2005 3:35:44 PM PST by Loyalist (Please visit this fine lady's blog: fiatmihi.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Let's not forget that people used to say that women couldn't drive an automobile."

So, how many NASCAR drivers are women? F1? Indy?

Ok, so there were one or two drag racers (but those don't count, drag racers are just adrenalin junkies, not drivers).

Women do abound in adrenalin junkie fields. Skydiving. Aerobatic pilots. etc.

I think the real difference is the difference in "interest" that women vs. men have in a particular subject. Math and science just usually aren't there for women.

4 posted on 01/18/2005 3:35:56 PM PST by narby (If a wise man has an argument with a fool, the fool only rages and laughs, and there is no quiet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
An interesting essay illustrating how bad the problem has become (from the Left, actually) can be found here.
5 posted on 01/18/2005 3:36:31 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Dr. Hopkins said. "Let's not forget that people used to say that women couldn't drive an automobile."

And your point is...?

6 posted on 01/18/2005 3:39:43 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Dr. Hopkins.

She looks like my uncle.

7 posted on 01/18/2005 3:40:29 PM PST by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn't breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill," Dr. Hopkins said.

Here's some smelling salts, dear. Perhaps a dose of Lydia Pinkham's will restore your fragile constitution.

It was once argued that women just couldn't bear the physical and mental strain of the professions, and here comes Dr. Hopkins to give credence to those long-discredited arguments.

8 posted on 01/18/2005 3:41:36 PM PST by Loyalist (Please visit this fine lady's blog: fiatmihi.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Dr. Hopkins said, "I didn't disagree, but didn't like the way he presented that point because I like to work 80 hours a week, and I know a lot of women who work that hard."

Mr. Summers was quoting research studies with statistical data, while Miz Hopkins is working with her "feelings."

'Nuff said.

9 posted on 01/18/2005 3:43:21 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

Dr. Denton.

My uncle is prettier than her.

I'm guessing big K.D. Lang fan.

Arf.

Yes, that really is her picture.

10 posted on 01/18/2005 3:45:57 PM PST by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

For a woman, Dr. Hopkins had quite a rational response to Larry's remarks.


11 posted on 01/18/2005 3:47:31 PM PST by ReadyNow (A teacher of math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Oh, Lord, love a duck:

Dr. Hopkins said, "I didn't disagree, but didn't like the way he presented that point because I like to work 80 hours a week, and I know a lot of women who work that hard."

Riiight. The "personal" is "political" -- ain't no one ever heard that dodge before... sheez. Or even better:

"I didn't disagree with what he said... I didn't like the way he said it!"

I'm working up to a puke here... :>

12 posted on 01/18/2005 3:48:52 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

I saw Dr. Hopkins on tv this AM with Ms. Kouric. When asked if she would like to sit down and talk to the miscreant, she would not commit. This is maturity at the ivy league level-I won't talk to him because I'm mad at him-not until he apologizes (her exact words were she'd have to see a change in attitude). Sorry Dr. Hopkins, but women ARE different.


13 posted on 01/18/2005 3:49:33 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Paula E. Stephan, a professor of economics at Georgia State University, said Dr. Summers' remarks offended some participants, but not her. "I think if you come to participate in a research conference," Dr. Stephan said, "you should expect speakers to present hypotheses that you may not agree with and then discuss them on the basis of research findings."

*************

Makes sense to me. Dr. Hopkins only helped to prove Dr. Summers' case that women may be innately different. Instead of staying to argue his points, she was overcome by emotion and left.

14 posted on 01/18/2005 3:50:47 PM PST by trisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I don't get this. . . as a female engineer with degrees in math and physics. Is it because I went to parochial school that I never thought twice about my major course of study?
Or because I had four sisters and no brothers? Or because my father, an engineer, supported my endeavor?


15 posted on 01/18/2005 3:51:23 PM PST by SouthCarolinaKit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"When he started talking about innate differences in aptitude between men and women, I just couldn't breathe because this kind of bias makes me physically ill," Dr. Hopkins said. "Let's not forget that people used to say that women couldn't drive an automobile."

I didn't read anything about aptitude in Summers' comments. He was talking about the innate differences in the sexes and how they approach things. There is a difference, and most teenage girls are not interested in math and science because the feeling STILL persists in young women that being 'brainy' is a turn off to guys. At that point in their lives, getting a date is more important than solving quadratic equations. Grown women who no longer feel that tug may not like it and disagree, but you can't avoid the facts.

There are more women in the math and science fields than over before, and there is not the continued harassment and discrimination that women encountered in the past. Sounds like some of the women at this conference just decided they were gonna get their pantyhose in a twist, and wouldn't be dissuaded.

16 posted on 01/18/2005 3:51:32 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Let's not forget that people used to say that women couldn't drive an automobile."

Ahem...

17 posted on 01/18/2005 3:55:17 PM PST by xjcsa (Everything matters if anything matters at all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Denice D. Denton, the chancellor designate of the University of California, Santa Cruz, questioned Dr. Summers sharply during the conference, saying she needed to "speak truth to power."

"Speaking Truth to Power" is exactly what Dr Summers WAS doing. In Academia today, the feminists ARE the power

18 posted on 01/18/2005 4:04:44 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (We are going to fight until hell freezes over and then we are going to fight on the ice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is typical politicization of science - what you say will never get taken on its face, it's all about whether it measures with the sensibilities of the protected class.

MIT's self-flaggelating study of women in faculty wasn't taken too seriously by anyone except those who wanted it to be true. In fact, MIT's new president Susan Hockfield was apparently on a board at Yale that debunked (or at least cited concerns with) the study.


19 posted on 01/18/2005 4:09:32 PM PST by MIT-Elephant ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

"Dr. Hopkins said, "I didn't disagree, but didn't like the way he presented that point because I like to work 80 hours a week, and I know a lot of women who work that hard."

How did Nixon get elected? I don't know a single person who voted for him!


20 posted on 01/18/2005 4:10:44 PM PST by MIT-Elephant ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson