Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nyg4168

look at the US Constitution, Article One, Section Eight, Part Eleven.

allow me to quote it for you:

The Constitution of the United States... ARTICLE I... Section 8. Powers of Congress... The Congress shall have the power... 11.To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water...

Look up the meaning of "letters of marque and reprisal" and then think of the implications such a power has on the types of arms a private citizen is "allowed" to possess according to the wisdom of the Founders.

Again, allow me to cut to the chase:
A letter of marque and reprisal is a congressional writ authorizing a private citizen to cunduct maritime acts of war against a foreign enemy's assets, military/naval and/or shipping/commercial, using his own privately owned ship(s) armed with his own privately owned cannons.

You should also try to understand that the "militia" definition the Founders had in mind was the reserve militia comprising all able-bodied men at least seventeen years of age. These militia were not the standing army, nor were they the "select" or cadre militia of the several states, nor yet were they the paramilitary forces of the police or fire brigades. They were the common man, and trhey were expected to be armed and trained at their own expense with at least the standard shoulder-arm of the day.

As to "arms" - one last note: DO YOU THINK THE FOUNDERS WERE IDIOTS???
They were well aware of technological progress in firearms design, and knew very well that further improvements were inevitable. Why do you think they used the term "ARMS" instead of "flintlock rifled musket"?


50 posted on 01/18/2005 1:13:33 PM PST by King Prout (Halloween... not just for breakfast anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: King Prout

I like your #50 - Honest, I did not read it before posting.


117 posted on 01/18/2005 2:53:01 PM PST by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: newsgatherer

Yes take away our Second Amendment rights from law abiding Citizens so that law breaking idiots will just use a gun Anyway. My mother is a Second Amendment sister and I am in the NRA and damn proud of it. If they take away our guns what's next? Knives? Laser Pointers? They're probably even trying to get rid of Paintball guns. Thank GOD for our Right Wing Americans defending our rights! HOOAHH!


395 posted on 01/20/2005 8:59:12 AM PST by Yank_In_A_Tank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson