Yes and cars are a specific type of transportation but neither cars nor cannon are covered by the 2nd.
How bizarre. You are bringing cars into the issue simply to pettifog it even further. For shame Jim.
You ask me to "get" something that you fail to prove.
Not at all.. I'm trying to get you to admit that the words of the 2nd are clear. Our rights to ARMS shall not be infringed. Cannons are a type of ARM. You refuse to 'get it', and are getting desperate enough to play silly word games about cars.
"Not at all.. I'm trying to get you to admit that the words of the 2nd are clear. Our rights to ARMS shall not be infringed. Cannons are a type of ARM. You refuse to 'get it', and are getting desperate enough to play silly word games about cars."
Jonestown, it takes more than yoiur simply repeating something to make it so. There is no legal basis for your position and there is no historic case either. That leaves you with opinion alone, not enough.