Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Gato

“Actually the Supreme Court never stooped to accept a case challenging the AWB. Plus the Congress and the President rarely consider the Courts precedents or the Constitution in passing laws these days (they once did, as when they "got around" the lack of power to ban or regulate guns by taxing the snot out of them, ignoring the fact that they can't use powers that they do have to violate the rights protected by the Bill of Rights, that being the whole point of passing the BoR in the first place.)”

Exactly and well said. We can pontificate about our “rights” all day but unless the Congress or the Courts agree, the rights simply have no effect in law.




301 posted on 01/19/2005 9:13:58 AM PST by Jim Verdolini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Verdolini
We can pontificate about our "rights" all day but unless the Congress or the Courts agree, the rights simply have no effect in law.

301 Jim Verdolini






There you go again..

Our rights are clearly outlined in the Constitution.
Pontificating that unless "Congress or the Courts agree" - on what those rights entail, means that "the rights simply have no effect in law", -- is simply bad logic.

Congress & the Courts quite often write or adjudicate bad law. 'We the people' decide whether we will allow it to prevail. [See the 18th Amendment]

We are rapidly approaching that decision point with the 2nd, imo.
340 posted on 01/19/2005 10:45:02 AM PST by jonestown ( A fanatic is a person who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." ~ Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Verdolini
We can pontificate about our “rights” all day but unless the Congress or the Courts agree, the rights simply have no effect in law.

Or we push the reset button that is protected by the Second amendment and exercise the right and duty indicated by Jefferson in the extract below.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.—

375 posted on 01/19/2005 7:55:24 PM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson