Your link shows shells change, lemur-like-mammal teeth change, etc. I don't see a smooth transition from, for example, a worm to a fish or a fish to a reptile or a reptile to a bird or a monkey to a man.
The only necessary conclusion from the data you provided is that shells and lemur change form and remain shells and lemurs. That's micro-evolution and nobody denies it.
It is quite a stretch of - dare I say it - faith to propose that the only conclusion from changes in form within a particular type of animal is that one type of animal evolves into another type.
Classic evolutionist bait and switch: claim macro-evolution is a fact and present examples of micro-evolution as proof.
Bottom line: Finches stay finches, moths stay moths, fruit flies stay fruit flies, etc.
Indeed you don't. You left off the primitive chordates, the amphibians, the feathered dinosaurs, and the apes in the places where they bridge gaps.
I've seen another freeper use this site, the Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ, to show the progression from fish to elephant in small steps. You'll pardon me if I don't reproduce the effort, but I can probably find it if you're interested.
You're making too big of a thing about what you personally don't know. Obviously, you don't know beans. So what?
I suppose nobody denies micro tectonics, that continental plates can move an inch or two a year, either. And nobody denies micro erosion, that a mountain can have a few inches or even feet wear off in rockslides, mudslides, stream erosion, and glaciation.
Gets a little stupid to assume that changes we can see happening won't keep on accumulating, doesn't it? Especially in the absence of any sort of mechanism to stop or reverse the changes.