Apologies, I missed the post where that happened (a specific technical achievement of modern creation science). Please can you direct me to the post.
Your continued failure to convincingly explain the brilliant folks support of Creationism is noted.
The fallacy of holding up people like Newton as creationists as if that were some kind of argument against ToE has been pointed out so many times that it is truly boring to repeat the rebuttal. Have you guys got amnesia?
Newton was a great man of his time. Newton had no opportunity to support or believe in the theory of evolution because he died long before it was proposed. Therefore to put people like Newton and Galileo on lists of "Great Creationist Scientists" as if that were an argument against ToE is a form of intellectual dishonesty. Everyone was a creationist then. Can you not see how feeble that makes your arguments look?
It's not remotely a priority for me to go back over the thread and search out the posts that mentioned current achievements of note of Creationists. Besides that, you are not likely to be influenced by facts in the matter.
Facts are against the dogma of the RELIGION OF SCIENCE--that only altar at which you bow. So, you are obligated to ignore them.
Heck, by that standard Darwin himself could be considered a "great (or at least significant) creation scientist". He was still a creationist at the time, for instance, that developed and published an innovative and correct theory of the formation of coral reefs and atolls.