[bondserv]

BTW, you are aware that science isn't determined by the "capitalistic competition of ideas" but by the evidence.

When a person views the interpretive skills of the scientists in peer-reviewd journals, truth is rarely the desired result. Many of these clown boxers can't program their VCR, let alone make judgments on less than 1% of the potential data. Most of them are sheep that tow the line so they can get their grant check from the alums.

Give the alums a capitalistic chance to see the data handled with integrity and they will begin forcing changes at their Alma Maters. Disclaimers in the textbooks is just the calm before the storm. The Adults are taking back the establishment.

[Junior]

When a person views the interpretive skills of the scientists in peer-reviewd journals, truth is rarely the desired result. Many of these clown boxers can't program their VCR, let alone make judgments on less than 1% of the potential data.

So basically you, who have little or no grounding in the biological sciences know more about the subject than folks actually working in the field (the peers reviewing the work). Why haven't you submitted for your Nobel Prize yet?