[furball4paws]

Is there anybody on these crevo threads that argues the Creationist/ID side from a solid knowledge base, understands science and has actually read what they are railing against?

[Junior]

Is there anybody on these crevo threads that argues the Creationist/ID side from a solid knowledge base, understands science and has actually read what they are railing against?

No. One guy used to come close, but he's since degenerated into word lawyering.

[js1138]

I can think of three ID posters who are well educated and argue well. One of them hasn't posted much in the last few months, and the other two avoid flame threads.

[PatrickHenry]

Is there anybody on these crevo threads that argues the Creationist/ID side from a solid knowledge base, understands science and has actually read what they are railing against?

Not that I've seen. Some (very few) seem to be knowledgeable, but they only go so far, then they just kind of shut down and won't allow themselves to see any more evidence, or to draw the inevitable conclusions. They're usually well-behaved.

[Thatcherite]

I haven't seen one yet.