Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bobdsmith; metacognative
If not then you are wasting everyones time by asking for fossil examples that you are always, no matter what they look like, going to say they aren't transitional.

Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winnah!

Step One: Claim that something reasonably to be expected in the fossil record is lacking and scientists are in a panic to explain why it isn't there. If that slides unchallenged, you win. If challenged, go to Step Two.

Step Two: Fossils seeming to show transitions don't mean anything.

256 posted on 01/18/2005 3:08:01 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro

Its the best response to the typical "if evolution is true where are all the transitionals?" question.

Just ask "well first what do you think a transitional would look like?"

And immediately they try and escape the topic for they know if they actually make their claim testable, ie put their ss on the line, it could very well be refuted.


257 posted on 01/18/2005 3:14:11 PM PST by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: VadeRetro
Step Two: Fossils seeming to show transitions don't mean anything.

I think the terms "half formed" and "useless" usually creep into the creos vocabulary at this point.

265 posted on 01/18/2005 3:27:27 PM PST by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson