[RobRoy]

>>DNA sequence comparisons massively support common descent through the phylogenetic tree. What was that about DNA supporting creationism?<<

No they don't. They support that the life forms were designed by the same designer to live within the same planets broad ecosystem.

In fact, I would EXPECT such evidence if there was a designer.

[Thatcherite]

No they don't. They support that the life forms were designed by the same designer to live within the same planets broad ecosystem. In fact, I would EXPECT such evidence if there was a designer.

Yeah, right, including near-perfect duplication of sequencing errors in near relations, including near-perfect duplication of junk DNA in near relations. (remember, to the designer, there is no such thing as a "relation")

Why does the designer keep throwing away all the old designs and creating new ones that are really similar to the old ones?

[Oztrich Boy]

No they don't. They support that the life forms were designed by the same designer to live within the same planets broad ecosystem.

In fact, I would EXPECT such evidence if there was a designer.

As of course evidenced by the high similarity between shark and dolphin DNA