Replies

I could just as well, and to a high degree of certainty, state that the evolutionists supposed "science", which supposedly "proves" evolutionary theory, is nothing more than pseudoscience used to score points with their opponents. Your site really proves nothing, and is just a counter-punch at best. I have seen that site before, and could just as easily say that it is "laughable."

Your Ad-Hominem laced diatribe is noted, as well as your use of the oft pulled out "straw man argument."

You missed showing how my argument is somehow a straw-man. Argument by assertion is not an argument, my friend. In fact, I'd say your attacks on my arguments better fit your own argumentative style, looking at the other threads here, especially since you have an inability to learn anything from the knowledgeable people who have responded to you, and you continue to repeat things that you have been shown to be completely untrue.

I could just as well, and to a high degree of certainty, state that the evolutionists supposed "science", which supposedly "proves" evolutionary theory, is nothing more than pseudoscience used to score points with their opponents.

Actually you couldn't because the assumption in the last phrase of the last sentence is a massive non sequitor.

There are a few, but only a very few scientists who devote any time at all to monitoring creationists/iders, much less consider them (viable) "opponents". Most scientists don't pay any attention at all, for much the same reason they don't pore over that unsolicited missive from the guy building a flying saucer in the garage, describing the craft's anti-gravity drive system. They don't have the time or inclination. They're too busy and engaged in doing science.

Creationists are sort of like France. They think they're important, or should be, but most sensible people mostly ignore them.