Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shortwave

I expect they hate it- but to be fair, it's relatively fuel efficient for it's size- according to the Times today "It burns 12 per cent less fuel than the jumbo jet and it will be the first long-haul aircraft to consume less than three litres of fuel per passenger over 100km - a rate comparable to an economical family car."


68 posted on 01/18/2005 8:20:27 AM PST by Ed Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Ed Thomas

Ed,

Are you in Maine? Anyway, that maybe during flight but did it state what the consumption of fuel would be to get to cruising altitude?


73 posted on 01/18/2005 8:23:55 AM PST by Shortwave (Supporting Bush was a duty one owed to the fallen. Now, it is an honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Ed Thomas
...the first long-haul aircraft to consume less than three litres of fuel per passenger over 100km - a rate comparable to an economical family car...

Yeah, but that's assuming the plane has a full load. I think it might be a challenge to fill the seats on these behemoths.

90 posted on 01/18/2005 8:30:44 AM PST by Finny (God continue to Bless President G.W. Bush with wisdom, popularity, safety and success.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson