Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Happy2BMe

Smaller and fuel effecient seems to be the direction profitable airlines are going - this is ridiculous.


107 posted on 01/18/2005 8:38:04 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 1Old Pro
I'm still waiting for this:
111 posted on 01/18/2005 8:39:41 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: 1Old Pro

"Smaller and fuel effecient seems to be the direction profitable airlines are going - this is ridiculous.

"

Not necessarily. On some routes, this plane, or one like it, might make sense. I'm thinking JFK to London or LAX to Tokyo. Busy, full flights, all the time.

It's not going to work from LAX to ORD, though.


112 posted on 01/18/2005 8:39:43 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: 1Old Pro
"Smaller and fuel effecient seems to be the direction profitable airlines are going - this is ridiculous."

=======================

I noticed neither Russia or China had a hand in this. But do the Euros know something about future fuel (abundant) fuel availability that we don't?

114 posted on 01/18/2005 8:40:58 AM PST by Happy2BMe ("Islam fears democracy worse than anything If the imams can't control it - they will kill it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson