The point of this is for the COURT to revisit the ORIGINAL QUESTION... 32 years of history since the matter was first decided is relevent to the question.
The revisitation is being prompted by Ms. McCorvey's statement that she misled the court.
The court will not reverse based on a 32-year-late admission. About the best Ms. McCorvey can hope for is that she doesn't get racked up for perjury.