Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah

Not possible becuase of the "CATCH-22" any "new law" will be deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on Roe v. Wade.. Correct Roe v. Wade, and new law is not needed


47 posted on 01/17/2005 1:47:20 PM PST by davidosborne (www.davidosborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: davidosborne
Not possible becuase of the "CATCH-22" any "new law" will be deemed UNCONSTITUTIONAL based on Roe v. Wade.. Correct Roe v. Wade, and new law is not needed.

Ever hear of two cases, Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education?

The Court did a 180-degree turn on the controversy at the center of those two cases.

It can happen again.

Roe v. Wade is not going to be "corrected" 32 years after it closes, based solely on a Rule 60(b) filing by the plaintiff (who did, after all, get what she asked for at the time). Period. That's not how the legal system actually works.

58 posted on 01/17/2005 1:52:42 PM PST by Poohbah (God must love fools. He makes so many of them...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson