[davidosborne]

If the court decides that matter was originally WRONGLY decided, then YES it should be reopened and the issue CORRECTED.. its a matter of correcting a wrong act, and moving on.. we have suffered long enough under that poor decision its time to overturn it and ask God's forgiveness.

1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us [our] sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

[Poohbah]

If the court decides that matter was originally WRONGLY decided, then YES it should be reopened and the issue CORRECTED.. its a matter of correcting a wrong act, and moving on.. we have suffered long enough under that poor decision its time to overturn it and ask God's forgiveness

You are (deliberately?) conflating two different causes of action here, no matter how many times you are corrected.

The court will not consider this motion, because the case closed 32 years ago. The motion to reconsider under Rule 60(b) cannot meet any reasonable definition of timely review and reconsideration of the case.

The court will NOT discuss whether the matter was wrongly decided, because Ms. McCorvey's filing doesn't address that issue at all.