"the problem is that she is filing 32 years after the case was closed . "
Compare this with the case of "Plessy vs. ferguson "
In that case, the Court stated that Segregation is O.K.
Then, in "Brown vs. the Board of Education " , the court reversed itself . what kind of "Stare Decisis" is that ?
Besides, over the years, since 1972, sonograms, etc. have been developed to show that Life does begin lots earlier than the warren Court thought .
I think the case should be considered .
And, supposing you get your way...
Fifteen years from now, the libs have a 5-4 majority on the court and want to reopen the case AGAIN.
What's your argument against doing so?