[Michael.SF.]

a handful have even threatened to resign rather than teach alongside what they consider a "pseudoscience."

Two comments:

There i$ one primary rea$on Doctor$ are oppo$$ed to Chiropractor$.

Other then drugs or surgery what are a Doctor's options when it comes to back pain? Answer: virtually none

[Bushforlife]

Please see my post #53.

So according to your logic, if a practitioner wishes to shake a rattle and dance around the patients' bed as a treatment, then the only reason doctors oppose that treatment is for financial concerns.

I think that in truth, the opposite is what is really happening. There is an illness that is very hard to treat, so a pseudoscience has evolved which claims it has the answers. For money.

[wi jd]

There i$ one primary rea$on Doctor$ are oppo$$ed to Chiropractor$.

What rea$on might that be? The $ame rea$on "doctor$" pu$h unnece$$ary drug$?

I am a firm believer in chiropractic. It has helped me personally with back pain, neck pain, knee pain & hip pain.

Unfortunately there are those in the Flat Earth Society who will hear of no such thing.