Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xJones
Whoops, I didn't preview. The quote should be:

Decode's alternative proposal is that the flipped version was carried for many years in a different human lineage, one of the archaic populations that preceded the emergence of anatomically modern humans in Africa 150,000 years ago. Then, in some episode of rape or interbreeding, a single copy of the flipped version entered the modern human lineage some time before humans left Africa 60,000 years ago.

4 posted on 01/16/2005 5:34:24 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: xJones
If the particular genetic lineage is found in only 20% of European populations, why would the "cross" have occurred in Africa?

Seems to me we have evidence of a "cross" in Europe at a later time, say when Neandertals and Cro-Magnon people co-existed.

The far smaller incidence of this genetic lineage occuring in African or Asian populations is probably due more to the romantic failure of Western European adventurers than any other factor.

5 posted on 01/16/2005 6:03:46 PM PST by muawiyah (Egypt didn't invent civilization time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson