To: Blue Jays
That is great news that it is NOT considered a security threat. Does that mean that our legislators will update the laws so that Americans are free to add Heckler & Koch MP5s to our collections?LOL - Really. I mean if the gov't doesn't consider the loss of one of these a major problem then what's the problem of me owning one if I could afford it.
13 posted on
01/16/2005 5:11:00 PM PST by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org • Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: 2nd amendment mama; Joe Brower
Hi 2AMama-
"...if the government doesn't consider the loss of one of these [H&K MP5] a major problem then what's the problem of me owning one if I could afford it..."
It's funny how the commentary of Big GovernmentTM changes depending upon circumstance. If some regular man or woman was found shooting this type of firearm at a range, words like "arsenal" and "gun nut" would be tossed around by the media in footage showing the arrest of the citizen.
~ Blue Jays ~
17 posted on
01/16/2005 5:29:50 PM PST by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: 2nd amendment mama
I mean if the gov't doesn't consider the loss of one of these a major problem then what's the problem of me owning one if I could afford it. If it weren't for all the NFA rules and laws, you could afford one, or something with similar capabilities that it's makers weren't quite so "proud of". A sten or derivative is dirt cheap to make.
30 posted on
01/17/2005 7:56:28 PM PST by
El Gato
(Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson