Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Release Tsunami Effect Data
Science - AP ^ | Sat Jan 15,11:37 PM ET 2005 | ARTHUR MAX

Posted on 01/16/2005 6:38:09 AM PST by Pharmboy

COLOMBO, Sri Lanka - Boats at sea felt only a gentle swell as the Asian tsunami passed under their hulls — but by the time the first giant wave slammed into Sri Lanka's coast it was a monstrous 15 feet high, scientists say.

A 15-member tsunami research team found that the wave struck with crushing force in some places, yet washed almost gently over the coast just a few hundred yards away, affected by shoreline and seabed features, the scientists said Saturday, releasing preliminary data at a seminar.

The tsunami took an hour and 50 minutes to reach Sri Lanka after being triggered by an underwater earthquake off Indonesia's Sumatra island, said Philip Liu of Cornell University in the United States.

It took another 30 minutes to whiplash around the island to the southwestern coast, where it devastated Galle, the country's second-largest city.

"If we had an adequate warning system, there would have been enough time to evacuate the coastal region," Liu said. "It was a hard lesson to learn."


Members from the Disaster Assistance Relief Team pass under a
damaged bridge in Pottuvil, Sri Lanka, Saturday, Jan. 15, 2005. The
military was in the area to help ferry residents across the water which
would normally have been crossed by the bridge. (AP PHOTO/Adrian
Wyld)

Nearly 31,000 people were confirmed dead and another 6,000 were missing, putting Sri Lanka second only to Indonesia in casualties from the Dec. 26 disaster. In all, more than 157,000 people died across 11 countries.

Costas Synolakis, of the University of Southern California, said scientists need more information about underwater topography to map out vulnerable spots.

Liu, a professor of civil and environmental engineering who helped develop the Pacific Ocean tsunami warning system, led the team, which included members of the U.S. National Science Foundation and the U.S. Geological Survey.

The researchers have been chasing tsunamis for 12 years to study how to predict them, calculate their force and mitigate their effects.

One lesson learned, said Synolakis, is that tsunamis can hammer a coast for hours. If you escape to high ground, "never go back for at least six hours. This is no joke. It may be a difficult decision if you see people stranded," he said, but he warned that more waves come with surprising speed.

The Asian tsunami traveled across deep ocean at 500 mph, the speed of an airplane, Liu said. It was more than 180 miles wide and had a mild slope virtually undetectable in satellite photographs.

It was only when the tsunami neared shallow coastal waters that the waves grew steeper until the leading one became a wall of water, its energy lethally compressed.

Not every underwater earthquake sets off a tsunami, Liu said. In last month's disaster, one tectonic plate slipped under another, causing a vertical displacement of the sea floor.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beach; staywaway; tsunami; whattodo
I searched and could not find this story posted. I thought the "don't go back to the beach for six hours [after the first tsunami wave]" a pearl of wisdom that Freepers should know.
1 posted on 01/16/2005 6:38:10 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The tsunami took an hour and 50 minutes to reach Sri Lanka after being triggered by an underwater earthquake off Indonesia's Sumatra island, said Philip Liu of Cornell University in the United States.

It took another 30 minutes to whiplash around the island to the southwestern coast, where it devastated Galle, the country's second-largest city.

Liu said they could've evacuated. Enough time to evacuate? Maybe yes, maybe no. Unfortunately, we'll never know.

2 posted on 01/16/2005 6:54:37 AM PST by b4its2late (You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late
I had the same thought: not a lot of time to evacuate.

Further, many of these locations had barrier islands with a few bridges to the mainland. In an emergency, rapid evacuation from such is REALLY a problem.

3 posted on 01/16/2005 7:00:59 AM PST by Pharmboy (Listen...you can still hear the old media sobbing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

That's right. Now, if we were talking hours, then I think there would've been time. But 50 minutes in a panic situation is not alot of time IMHO. Yes sure, there definitely would've been less loss of life even with a 50 min warning. But how much less, I dunno.


4 posted on 01/16/2005 9:47:13 AM PST by b4its2late (You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson