You must be mistaking me for someone that follows the liberal media. I for one do not march in lock step cadence to the liberal media, or either of the two beltway party's.
I did notice you failed to address anything I have posted here about the UN, and WMD, or lack of in Iraq.
Cheers.
The glaringly obvious failure here is your failure to understand what was clearly explained.
You're right Joe, I must be mistaken. Glad to hear that you won't be using their lock-step, neo-words.
I did notice you failed to address anything I have posted here about the UN, and WMD, or lack of in Iraq.
Anthrax - Iraq admitted making 2,200 gallons of anthrax spores. U.N. inspectors determined Iraq had the capability to produce three times that much. Saddam was supposed to destroy the anthrax and Saddam was supposed to prove that he destroyed the anthrax.
Saddam never did.
Botulinum Toxin - Iraq admitted producing 5,300 gallons of the stuff. 70 billionths of a grams of the stuff is enough to kill if inhaled. Saddam was supposed to destroy the Botulinum Toxin. Saddam was supposed to prove that he destroyed the Botulinum Toxin.
Saddam never did.
Shall I go on? There's a lot more stuff to cover. He had VX, he had Sarin and he had much more...
He was supposed to get rid of all of it and he was supposed to prove that he got rid of all of it. Anything short of that represents a reasonable risk.
Saddam never proved anything.