Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I was wrong about Iraq
Times Online ^ | January 14, 2005 | John Maples

Posted on 01/15/2005 2:30:04 PM PST by Prost1

Chaos will flourish in the Middle East if President Bush’s policy continues unchanged

EVEN DONALD RUMSFELD, in his more private moments, must wonder if the invasion of Iraq was really such a good idea. It has become obvious to almost everyone else, including many such as myself who originally supported the war, that it has been a huge mistake. My support was based solely on the evidence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), on which the intelligence was exaggerated and which Washington has just admitted it is no longer looking for. There is absolutely no evidence that Iraq was supporting al-Qaeda. I believe that the real reason for the war, at least in the US, was to create a reasonably democratic, free-market Iraq to act as both a beacon and a rebuke to other countries in the region. That possibility looks more and more remote. The forthcoming elections look unlikely to produce a government with real authority and legitimacy, or to stop the violence, but they must go ahead; let us hope that they prove a step on the road to normality. Despite the bombing of the UN headquarters in August 2003, the current appalling level of violence did not begin until March 2004, a year after the invasion. It might have been more easily contained if the postwar administration had not made so many early mistakes.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: hadenuf; whitefeather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-353 next last
To: COEXERJ145

Quote: There are plenty who would consider themselves to the "right" of the political spectrum who hate President Bush just as much. Some are in this thread right now.

sorry to burst your bubble but not everyone is a Bushbot and agrees with everything he does in the white house.


121 posted on 01/15/2005 6:21:48 PM PST by superiorslots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Thanks! Nice add-ons.


122 posted on 01/15/2005 6:22:50 PM PST by torchthemummy ("Terrorism has less to do with economic poverty than with political poverty." - Jane Novak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots
re: Shites who hate with a passion the Sunnies

True, but the only thing they hate worse than each other is the US and its allies. They can tolerate each other long enough to attempt to defeat us. That region of the world views things in terms of centuries, not the decades that we use to judge outcomes. It's trite, but the saying still is: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" They have enough hate to go around! They can spend a few decades hating us then go right back to several more centuries of hating each other.
123 posted on 01/15/2005 6:23:40 PM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots
The Jihadis have the oil but we control their water flow. Mission Accomplished.
124 posted on 01/15/2005 6:23:41 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots
Agreeing with President Bush does not make someone a "Bushbot" (a term coined by the followers of Pat Buchanan to trash anyone who supports the President) and just like "neo-con" it is thrown out there by some who most likely have never supported the President on anything and hate him just as much as the Democrats do.
125 posted on 01/15/2005 6:23:58 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Ditto! (And no that doesn't mean I agree with everything Rush says.)


126 posted on 01/15/2005 6:26:47 PM PST by torchthemummy ("Terrorism has less to do with economic poverty than with political poverty." - Jane Novak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

re: Their country is theirs; let them sort it out. Or not.

Problem is they aren't content with keeping it inside their borders. They see their trials and tribulations as part of a much larger problem. Their solution to the problem includes doing away with anyone in the world that does not share their views, and that includes the US.


127 posted on 01/15/2005 6:26:53 PM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Goldwater4ever

These had little or nothing to due with our national security.


128 posted on 01/15/2005 6:30:38 PM PST by msjhall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: torchthemummy
Ditto!

OMG you said "Ditto!" You must be a "Mind Numbed Robot"! j/k

129 posted on 01/15/2005 6:32:34 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

'That's always been somewhat of a catch-22 to me. We blew off the UN's opinion of invading Iraq in order to enforce UN resolutions? '

We didn't blow off the United Nations. President Bush did what he could to push the U.N. to show that it's resolutions were meaningful. Also, we didn't go into Iraq to enforce them, we went in to remove Saddam.


130 posted on 01/15/2005 6:33:23 PM PST by msjhall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

re: A couple of times a week, killing 20 or so terrorists a pop

And don't forget all the weddings that we disrupted.


131 posted on 01/15/2005 6:33:48 PM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: jwpjr
My previous post addressed this: we leave behind a note that says "You f with us, we'll kill you."

What do you want to do, occupy and attempt to control every country on earth that might harbor people who have antipathy toward us?

132 posted on 01/15/2005 6:34:40 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots

The number one reason we invaded Iraq was for national security. All other reasons were secondary.


133 posted on 01/15/2005 6:35:46 PM PST by msjhall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: msjhall

Indeed.

Thank God the country wasn't in the hands of the Chamberlainite appeasers.


134 posted on 01/15/2005 6:36:42 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("Visualize Whirled Peas" - CHIEF Negotiator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

We know Saddam was supporting terrorism.


135 posted on 01/15/2005 6:38:48 PM PST by msjhall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Im'm sick of the naysayers, they don't have the brains to wipe their butts in the woods.


136 posted on 01/15/2005 6:39:30 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
We blew off the UN's opinion of invading Iraq in order to enforce UN resolutions?

It would be more accurate to say that the U.N. blew off the U.N.'s opinion. Every country that voted for "serious consequences" failing full and immediate compliance by Saddam knew exactly what that meant, and if they didn't Bush was on record before the vote on resolution 1441 stating clearly and irrevocably what it meant.

137 posted on 01/15/2005 6:39:58 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Agreed.

As for me, I'm damned glad we have Iran and Syria flanked.

That is more important than every other thing, in my book.


138 posted on 01/15/2005 6:48:25 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("Visualize Whirled Peas" - CHIEF Negotiator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

Not to take up too much bandwith but when one reads (rereads) the actual text of 1441 there is very little ambiguity. Then afterwards compile how many of the UN demands were unfulfilled, most multiple times in multiple resolutions:

The Security Council,

Recalling all its previous relevant resolutions, in particular its resolutions 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, 678 (1990) of 29 November 1990, 686 (1991) of 2 March 1991, 687 (1991) of 3 April 1991, 688 (1991) of 5 April 1991, 707 (1991) of 15 August 1991, 715 (1991) of 11 October 1991, 986 (1995) of 14 April 1995, and 1284 (1999) of 17 December 1999, and all the relevant statements of its President,

Recalling also its resolution 1382 (2001) of 29 November 2001 and its intention to implement it fully,

Recognizing the threat Iraq’s non-compliance with Council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security,

Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660 (1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security in the area,

Further recalling that its resolution 687 (1991) imposed obligations on Iraq as a necessary step for achievement of its stated objective of restoring international peace and security in the area,

Deploring the fact that Iraq has not provided an accurate, full, final, and complete disclosure, as required by resolution 687 (1991), of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than one hundred and fifty kilometres, and of all holdings of such weapons, their components and production facilities and locations, as well as all other nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to nuclear-weapons-usable material,

Deploring further that Iraq repeatedly obstructed immediate, unconditional, and unrestricted access to sites designated by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), failed to cooperate fully and unconditionally with UNSCOM and IAEA weapons inspectors, as required by resolution 687 (1991), and ultimately ceased all cooperation with UNSCOM and the IAEA in 1998,

Deploring the absence, since December 1998, in Iraq of international monitoring, inspection, and verification, as required by relevant resolutions, of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles, in spite of the Council’s repeated demands that Iraq provide immediate, unconditional, and unrestricted access to the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC), established in resolution 1284 (1999) as the successor organization to UNSCOM, and the IAEA, and regretting the consequent prolonging of the crisis in the region and the suffering of the Iraqi people,

Deploring also that the Government of Iraq has failed to comply with its commitments pursuant to resolution 687 (1991) with regard to terrorism, pursuant to resolution 688 (1991) to end repression of its civilian population and to provide access by international humanitarian organizations to all those in need of assistance in Iraq, and pursuant to resolutions 686 (1991), 687 (1991), and 1284 (1999) to return or cooperate in accounting for Kuwaiti and third country nationals wrongfully detained by Iraq, or to return Kuwaiti property wrongfully seized by Iraq,

Recalling that in its resolution 687 (1991) the Council declared that a ceasefire would be based on acceptance by Iraq of the provisions of that resolution, including the obligations on Iraq contained therein,

Determined to ensure full and immediate compliance by Iraq without conditions or restrictions with its obligations under resolution 687 (1991) and other relevant resolutions and recalling that the resolutions of the Council constitute the governing standard of Iraqi compliance,

Recalling that the effective operation of UNMOVIC, as the successor organization to the Special Commission, and the IAEA is essential for the implementation of resolution 687 (1991) and other relevant resolutions,

Noting the letter dated 16 September 2002 from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iraq addressed to the Secretary-General is a necessary first step toward rectifying Iraq’s continued failure to comply with relevant Council resolutions,

Noting further the letter dated 8 October 2002 from the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director-General of the IAEA to General Al-Saadi of the Government of Iraq laying out the practical arrangements, as a follow-up to their meeting in Vienna, that are prerequisites for the resumption of inspections in Iraq by UNMOVIC and the IAEA, and expressing the gravest concern at the continued failure by the Government of Iraq to provide confirmation of the arrangements as laid out in that letter,

Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Iraq, Kuwait, and the neighbouring States,

Commending the Secretary-General and members of the League of Arab States and its Secretary-General for their efforts in this regard,

Determined to secure full compliance with its decisions,

Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,

1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraq’s failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);

2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the Council;

3. Decides that, in order to begin to comply with its disarmament obligations, in addition to submitting the required biannual declarations, the Government of Iraq shall provide to UNMOVIC, the IAEA, and the Council, not later than 30 days from the date of this resolution, a currently accurate, full, and complete declaration of all aspects of its programmes to develop chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and other delivery systems such as unmanned aerial vehicles and dispersal systems designed for use on aircraft, including any holdings and precise locations of such weapons, components, sub-components, stocks of agents, and related material and equipment, the locations and work of its research, development and production facilities, as well as all other chemical, biological, and nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to weapon production or material;

4. Decides that false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq’s obligations and will be reported to the Council for assessment in accordance with paragraphs 11 and 12 below;

5. Decides that Iraq shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all, including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment, records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect, as well as immediate, unimpeded, unrestricted, and private access to all officials and other persons whom UNMOVIC or the IAEA wish to interview in the mode or location of UNMOVIC’s or the IAEA’s choice pursuant to any aspect of their mandates; further decides that UNMOVIC and the IAEA may at their discretion conduct interviews inside or outside of Iraq, may facilitate the travel of those interviewed and family members outside of Iraq, and that, at the sole discretion of UNMOVIC and the IAEA, such interviews may occur without the presence of observers from the Iraqi Government; and instructs UNMOVIC and requests the IAEA to resume inspections no later than 45 days following adoption of this resolution and to update the Council 60 days thereafter;

6. Endorses the 8 October 2002 letter from the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director-General of the IAEA to General Al-Saadi of the Government of Iraq, which is annexed hereto, and decides that the contents of the letter shall be binding upon Iraq;

7. Decides further that, in view of the prolonged interruption by Iraq of the presence of UNMOVIC and the IAEA and in order for them to accomplish the tasks set forth in this resolution and all previous relevant resolutions and notwithstanding prior understandings, the Council hereby establishes the following revised or additional authorities, which shall be binding upon Iraq, to facilitate their work in Iraq:

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall determine the composition of their inspection teams and ensure that these teams are composed of the most qualified and experienced experts available;

– All UNMOVIC and IAEA personnel shall enjoy the privileges and immunities, corresponding to those of experts on mission, provided in the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and the Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the IAEA;

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have unrestricted rights of entry into and out of Iraq, the right to free, unrestricted, and immediate movement to and from inspection sites, and the right to inspect any sites and buildings, including immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to Presidential Sites equal to that at other sites, notwithstanding the provisions of resolution 1154 (1998);

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to be provided by Iraq the names of all personnel currently and formerly associated with Iraq’s chemical, biological, nuclear, and ballistic missile programmes and the associated research, development, and production facilities;

– Security of UNMOVIC and IAEA facilities shall be ensured by sufficient United Nations security guards;

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to declare, for the purposes of freezing a site to be inspected, exclusion zones, including surrounding areas and transit corridors, in which Iraq will suspend ground and aerial movement so that nothing is changed in or taken out of a site being inspected;

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the free and unrestricted use and landing of fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, including manned and unmanned reconnaissance vehicles;

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right at their sole discretion verifiably to remove, destroy, or render harmless all prohibited weapons, subsystems, components, records, materials, and other related items, and the right to impound or close any facilities or equipment for the production thereof; and

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to free import and use of equipment or materials for inspections and to seize and export any equipment, materials, or documents taken during inspections, without search of UNMOVIC or IAEA personnel or official or personal baggage;

8. Decides further that Iraq shall not take or threaten hostile acts directed against any representative or personnel of the United Nations or the IAEA or of any Member State taking action to uphold any Council resolution;

9. Requests the Secretary-General immediately to notify Iraq of this resolution, which is binding on Iraq; demands that Iraq confirm within seven days of that notification its intention to comply fully with this resolution; and demands further that Iraq cooperate immediately, unconditionally, and actively with UNMOVIC and the IAEA;

10. Requests all Member States to give full support to UNMOVIC and the IAEA in the discharge of their mandates, including by providing any information related to prohibited programmes or other aspects of their mandates, including on Iraqi attempts since 1998 to acquire prohibited items, and by recommending sites to be inspected, persons to be interviewed, conditions of such interviews, and data to be collected, the results of which shall be reported to the Council by UNMOVIC and the IAEA;

11. Directs the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director-General of the IAEA to report immediately to the Council any interference by Iraq with inspection activities, as well as any failure by Iraq to comply with its disarmament obligations, including its obligations regarding inspections under this resolution;

12. Decides to convene immediately upon receipt of a report in accordance with paragraphs 4 or 11 above, in order to consider the situation and the need for full compliance with all of the relevant Council resolutions in order to secure international peace and security;

13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;

14. Decides to remain seized of the matter.



139 posted on 01/15/2005 6:48:31 PM PST by torchthemummy ("Terrorism has less to do with economic poverty than with political poverty." - Jane Novak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Agreeing with President Bush does not make someone a "Bushbot" (a term coined by the followers of Pat Buchanan to trash anyone who supports the President) and just like "neo-con" it is thrown out there by some who most likely have never supported the President on anything and hate him just as much as the Democrats do.


Bingo. "Bushbot" and "neo-con" are used mostly by those who can't debate, are losing an argument, or wish to change the subject into one of their pet peeves.


140 posted on 01/15/2005 6:50:52 PM PST by rdb3 (Real men don't whine. It's 2005 and everyone's gonna feel it this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-353 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson