There are a few people at this site who are enraged if you don't agree and then throw out the infamous DU label. And notice they didn't read the article and realize that the author herself questioned whether the story was true or not.They didn't read the article??? Who is "they". That, my friend, is gossip... and inflammatory.
I normally do not refer others to DU (I have only visited one time, and decided it was too fruity, for me...), but in your case...
I responded to the post, which I read as mocking a serious problem, and poo-pooing the articles writer. What's your purpose?
Malkin's premise in illustrating this "story" is spot on. The story relayed is questionable at best. Not only is it a doctor blogging a private conversation but why on God's earth would a Sky Marshall visit his physician and relay what should be a confidential security matter? It's okay if you want to believe it. I didn't see Durasell as mocking Malkin, you did.