Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOWN SANDY'S PANTS
New York Post ^ | 1/15/05

Posted on 01/15/2005 12:50:51 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: Jet Jaguar
S. Berger gives new meaning to be the "big-tent" party.
41 posted on 01/15/2005 9:07:25 AM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us
The Republicans already had their reaction about this back when the news of Berger's investigation surfaced. Since then, they have not said anything. As we can see, this is before a grand jury.

Public comment by Republicans could poison the jury pool, making it difficult to get a conviction. Once the Republicans open their mouths, the democrats would be in an all-out media blitz to protect Berger and make it seem like he is being railroaded.

The silence on this as someone said earlier, is indicative that the Administration has told them to be quiet while the investigation proceeds. I notice the democrats have been quiet as well, indicating to me that THEY know he is in deep do-do.

As far as the media...what else is new? However, the good old New York Post is following this story, as is Fox News. We have also assembled quite an interesting time line on these events.

Please calm down and catch up with this story, as it is VERY interesting!

42 posted on 01/15/2005 9:08:57 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Allosaurs_r_us

Excuse me, but your advice that Republicans should be throwing temper tantrums and making an extreme partisan spectacle of themselves when in fact the matter is in the jurisdiction of the DOJ where it is being investigated (and it's not just Berger) is counter-productive and would serve to immunize the dem gang, not hasten their facing justice.


43 posted on 01/15/2005 9:38:02 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pointsal


Looks like he's got a big tent in his jowels. Bet he stuffed some papers in them too!
44 posted on 01/15/2005 9:42:37 AM PST by demkicker (I'm Ra th er sick of Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I wondered at the time if he was actually working for a
foreign government.


45 posted on 01/15/2005 9:48:51 AM PST by RWCon (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
To emphasize the most important thing in this article:

Good catch .. the only one we know of, is Bruce Lindsey

46 posted on 01/15/2005 9:57:15 AM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: calex59

"If some of the documents show how clinton messed up security during his administration, it may be that he is invloved in this. I would love to see him called before the grand jury."

But my guess is we will never know. Good ol typical Sandy shredded the docs, and there are no copies.

And Kintoon the liar before a grand jury? What a joke.

No, I'm afraid good ol typical Sandy is going to get a wrist slapping, no jail time. And Bubba wants to be in the U.N., so it will be. So sad, no law for Dems in this country.

I love our president, but he has no heart for going after these guys (like when he let the Klintoon administration trash the white house...), and maybe he has a point. How far can we let the Counrtry be divided?

We the people? Our only recourse is on election day, and at least for now, we are winning.


47 posted on 01/15/2005 10:09:38 AM PST by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: clyde260

He didn't shred all the documents.

And they had enough information when he was confronted that he admitted taking notes during his July visits and taking them with him---something he would not have admitted if they didn't have some sort of pressure being put on him.

I'd say you can afford to be a little positive on this story--though we know from past experience not to get our hopes up too high.


48 posted on 01/15/2005 10:28:06 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: clyde260
I love our president, but he has no heart for going after these guys

And btw, wake up and smell the coffee. The grand jury was enpaneled last July. This president's DOJ IS going after these guys. I don't care for the handwringing whining based on fiction. I prefer to stick to facts.

49 posted on 01/15/2005 10:29:59 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

"typical Sandy" = "typical Clinton" = "typical democrat" = "typical liberal" = "typical anti-American" = "typical criminal"

Go to jail do not pass go.


50 posted on 01/15/2005 10:34:48 AM PST by SeaBiscuit (With God, I will never be alone again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Call me cynical, but I doubt anything at all will happen to Sandy Burglar for removing docs from the NA.


51 posted on 01/15/2005 11:15:57 AM PST by spodefly (This message packaged with desiccant. Do not open until ready for use or inspection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
We can't have one justice system for citizens and another for DEMOCRAT government officials.

Agreed with and appended.

52 posted on 01/15/2005 12:14:03 PM PST by Christian4Bush ("Dear Dems: Your message got out. A popular and electoral majority of voters rejected it. The End.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; Miss Marple
Excuse me, but your advice that Republicans should be throwing temper tantrums

Yeah I know. I'm just sick and tired of the Dems running our guys thru the ringer on petty B.S. For instance the Inauguration. Just need to rant once in a while to relieve the steam. Just kick me to make sure I'm payin attention. I'll come around eventually.

53 posted on 01/15/2005 9:12:14 PM PST by Allosaurs_r_us (Idaho Carnivores for Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Behavior you and I would be imprisoned for is tolerated by the Democrats and condoned even after excess is noted by legal authorities. And they wonder why people do not believe them.


54 posted on 01/15/2005 9:33:03 PM PST by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

"And btw, wake up and smell the coffee. The grand jury was enpaneled last July. This president's DOJ IS going after these guys. I don't care for the handwringing whining based on fiction. I prefer to stick to facts."

Sorry I took so long to respond, but I went to a Jet game party. (Came away with a loss and a broken toe)

Anyway, OK - let's stick to the facts. Did anyone care or investigate Andrew Cuomo after his hugh & series HUD screw up? What is going on with Fannie Mae? Raines, Gorelick, et al?

Now we have Oil for Food, Sandy Burglar, the recent CBS debacle of trying to illegally sway the U.S. presidential election, and all the rest I have failed to mention, though which are numerous.

I'm not a handwringer-whiner, rather I think a realist, just stating it as I see it. Our president chooses to take a high road rather than get down in the mud with these folks, and it seems to be paying off. We are winning elections. Perhaps the president is planning on letting history judge these apparent injustices? I dunno, but it is what it is.

BTW, Cync - I think you are a great poster, certainly more in the know than I ;)


55 posted on 01/16/2005 8:23:29 AM PST by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: clyde260

Thanks for the reply and sorry about your toe (ouch).

I understand your point. I guess I'm really convinced (naively perhaps---time will tell), that these grand juries aren't just marking time or going through the motions.

You are not a handwringer, I see, and didn't deserve that appellation!


56 posted on 01/16/2005 8:32:40 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wander if he could help us move?

Maybe he could inadvertently stuff our furniture down his pants and save us a moving bill. We'd be happy to rent a truck and just have sandy move us.
57 posted on 01/16/2005 8:34:16 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Just saw this thread, and it's in the same vane (sp?). I think "we" are getting a little fed up with all the apparent injustices perpetrated by the left, with seemingly little redress. In other words: "We" need a perk, no time for our side to become apathetic.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1321876/posts?page=18

P.S. This will be the best little toe break I ever had, for it will give me/us weeks of fun against the "toe-masher".


58 posted on 01/16/2005 8:51:17 AM PST by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Lib's reaction to the parties being reversed is known. Remember Fawn Hall.


59 posted on 01/16/2005 1:01:44 PM PST by JohnBovenmyer (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: andyk
one's ones, grrr
60 posted on 01/17/2005 4:41:10 PM PST by andyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson