Skip to comments.
DOWN SANDY'S PANTS
New York Post ^
| 1/15/05
Posted on 01/15/2005 12:50:51 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
1
posted on
01/15/2005 12:50:51 AM PST
by
kattracks
2
posted on
01/15/2005 12:54:13 AM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(Civilization is an enormous improvement on the lack thereof. (O'Rourke))
To: kattracks
Instead of being outraged, Democrats have laughed the whole thing off as "typical Sandy."
Then "typical Sandy" will find a lot of friends in JAIL that also have surprise packages in their PANTS.
INDICT and CONVICT "typical Sandy" now...
3
posted on
01/15/2005 1:00:30 AM PST
by
no_mm
("Give War a Chance." - Michael Savage)
To: kattracks
That thieving scumbag Berger's worst nightmare came true on November 2nd.
No reprieve, no pardon, no mercy.
To: no_mm
"typical Sandy" will find a lot of friends in JAIL that also have surprise packages in their PANTS.LMAO!
To: no_mm
Instead of being outraged, Democrats have laughed the whole thing off as "typical Sandy Democrat."
6
posted on
01/15/2005 1:02:20 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: Jet Jaguar
I'm really surprised Monica Slewisnky didn't get snuck down those pants hahaha
To: kattracks
Instead of being outraged, Democrats have laughed the whole thing off as "typical Sandy."
Typical Sandy" I believe that this is "Typical Clinton Administration". Removing Top Secret Documents, making Unauthorized copies oy Top Secret Documents!
For the Clintons and their lackies to say this type of behavior is Typical tells anyone with a shred of a Brain all they need to know. I certain;y hope the Feds follow through on this, but doubt it. When will they ever release all of the Papers on Clinton himself that are being held in New York by some Federal Clinton operative that the people will never see?
8
posted on
01/15/2005 1:04:39 AM PST
by
26lemoncharlie
(Sit nomen Dómini benedíctum,Ex hoc nunc, et usque in sæculum! per ómnia saecula saeculórum)
To: kattracks; All
9
posted on
01/15/2005 1:05:13 AM PST
by
backhoe
(-30-)
To: Howlin
Instead of being outraged, Democrats have laughed the whole thing off as "typical Sandy." But would Clinton & Co. be laughing if, say, Condoleezza Rice had been discovered sneaking top secret documents out of the White House in her bra?
FYI
10
posted on
01/15/2005 1:05:13 AM PST
by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: Lancey Howard
If some of the documents show how clinton messed up security during his administration, it may be that he is invloved in this. I would love to see him called before the grand jury.
11
posted on
01/15/2005 1:05:35 AM PST
by
calex59
To: kattracks
"And a Happy New Year...IN JAIL!"--Mr. Potter
12
posted on
01/15/2005 1:09:31 AM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Americans never quit. --Gen. Douglas MacArthur)
To: kattracks
Sloppiness? Sloppiness?
If Sandburglar is so sloppy, why did he not get any on his blue dress?
Maybe he can learn organizational skills in an 8 by 10?
13
posted on
01/15/2005 1:23:02 AM PST
by
ryan71
(Comfort and Aid)
To: Mo1
I've thought for a long time that this is how the libs think: They (libs) have no morals so they can "laugh it off" when they get caught, but when it's US, they say "But you HAVE morals and should KNOW better!"
14
posted on
01/15/2005 1:27:19 AM PST
by
bonfire
To: 26lemoncharlie
Instead of being outraged, Democrats have laughed the whole thing off as "typical Sandy." Typical? It's good to know that the clintons (co presidents) thought so little of this country's National Security, that they kept this man in their administration.
To: kattracks
There once was a Burglar named Sandy
Whose pants made him look downright randy
But the lump in his drawers
When he walked out the door
Was 'Top Secret', not that of a dandy!
EV
16
posted on
01/15/2005 1:32:08 AM PST
by
EternalVigilance
("Visualize Whirled Peas" - CHIEF Negotiator)
To: Jet Jaguar
It would be true to form if someone discovered "water" marks on those documents.
17
posted on
01/15/2005 1:37:28 AM PST
by
BobS
To: calex59
If some of the documents show how clinton messed up security during his administration, it may be that he is invloved in this.
I think it's already been established that Sandy was there at the behest of Clinton. Unfortunately, you can be sure that the documents that would make Clinton look bad are the one's that were "accidentally" destroyed. The only good news is that it's actually before a grand jury. I can't begin to imagine the media's reaction had this been Condi Rice doing the same thing at Bush's request!
18
posted on
01/15/2005 1:51:59 AM PST
by
andyk
To: kattracks
This man should be in jail. If I pulled any of these stunts in my job, DSS and the NSA would see to it that my life became a living hell.
19
posted on
01/15/2005 4:00:16 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
To: kattracks
By law, Berger man should at least go to trial.
If any member of Free Republic did the same thing they would be in Leavenworth already.
We can't have one justice system for citizens and another for government officials.
20
posted on
01/15/2005 4:04:31 AM PST
by
Beckwith
(John, you said I was going to be the First Lady. As of now, you're on the couch.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson