Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The CBS Whitewash (The coverup continues)
The Weekly Standard ^ | January 24, 2005 | Jonathan V. Last

Posted on 01/14/2005 7:34:57 PM PST by RWR8189

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: RWR8189

The media routinely FLAUNTS it's bias and political agenda! All but these genius's can see it every day. What as-holes.


21 posted on 01/14/2005 9:15:43 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
How do you proove documents are forged? It seems the only definitive proof would be to have the purportive author deny them. If the author is dead, I guess it can't be "prooved".

The fact that it is impossible to replicate the documents with the technology that existed at that time is, apparently, meaningless.

The investigation into political bias begins and ends with the statements of the criminals involved.

Quite the "investigation".

22 posted on 01/14/2005 10:04:54 PM PST by mcenedo (lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle


.

And yet,


LIBERAL Los Angeles Times Media Critic DAVID SHAW still tells us that:


RATHER's work 'Shoddy, Slipshod.' not LIBERAL..?

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1227809/posts

.


23 posted on 01/14/2005 10:14:49 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The more this report is examined, the crumbier it looks. Tony Blankley pretty much nailed it in a column the other day. Thornburgh acted as CBS's attorney, not as its investigator.


24 posted on 01/14/2005 10:45:12 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Texas Eagle

Now what did we read earlier in the week about Thornburgh's law firm?

I have to say I am REALLY disappointed in Thornburgh; I really thought he'd get the job done.

Boy, was I ever wrong.


25 posted on 01/14/2005 10:51:12 PM PST by Howlin (I need my Denny Crane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
From what I can tell of that report .. it went up to the line but wouldn't actually cross it

But it was also a CBS paid investigation and not a federal one

The bias part is not of issue .. we all know they are bias

what is of issue are Forged Military documents that were used to change an outcome of a Presidential Election

Which I believe are two different FEDERAL crimes
26 posted on 01/14/2005 10:56:41 PM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
This talk of securing an advance for a source and "changing the momentum" of the election is not normal journalistic practice. It is damning stuff.

I think this memo was the smoking gun and should be grounds for a grand jury indictment.

27 posted on 01/14/2005 11:27:35 PM PST by oldbrowser (You lost the election...........get over it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
The report tells us that Mapes and Rather had pursued the story for five years...
...Dick Thornburgh explained on the January 10 NewsHour, "If you're looking for a villain in this story, we have one. It's haste."

Do I really have to comment?

28 posted on 01/15/2005 11:04:41 AM PST by FreeKeys ("...as phony as a Dan Rather memo." -- James Taranto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"The Panel does not find a basis to accuse those who investigated, produced, vetted or aired the Segment of having a political bias"

"Look Bernie, of course there's a liberal bias in the news.  All the networks tilt left." -- CBS News President ANDREW HEYWARD, to six-time Emmy award winner Bernard Goldberg, quoted HERE and HERE.

29 posted on 01/15/2005 11:13:05 AM PST by FreeKeys (Obviously, SeeBS thinks it's OK to plant "evidence" if you think, or at least hope, someone's guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Better yet. The facts disclose that they WERE forged. Yes, that is a crime. SeeBS is covering their tracks and spinning this thing so that there will not be criminal charges against them. I wish that this could be persued to it's conclusion, but I know it won't.

When justice doesn't work for all of us, justice is no longer blind. Take the blindfold off of the lady, she can see elite vs. the common man, and the comman man can "eat cake". Take away justice for all and you take away liberty for all and the last one out of our Republic can turn out the lights.

30 posted on 01/15/2005 11:23:31 AM PST by timydnuc (I'll die on my feet before I'll live on my knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
It is also curious that while the panel could discover no political agenda at CBS, it readily found one elsewhere. Explaining how the authenticity of the documents first came to be questioned, Thornburgh and Boccardi--again without citing evidence--trace this to "some people on the Internet, at first primarily supporters of President Bush with their own conservative political agenda."

See "The WHO Funded It? Fallacy" HERE .

31 posted on 01/15/2005 11:26:33 AM PST by FreeKeys (PROOF of SeeBS fraud: http://freedomkeys.com/w-tangfacts.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
If they were concerned about gaps in Tytell's knowledge, did the panel consult other experts? No. Instead, Thornburgh and Boccardi solicited the opinion of this single expert; then, when he reached an unwanted conclusion, they turned their backs on it.

The report itself is as corrupt as CBS. What a disgrace.

32 posted on 01/15/2005 11:32:35 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
The only other possible conclusion is that CBS's promised full accounting is a whitewash.

Yep. That's exactly what it is.

33 posted on 01/15/2005 11:33:55 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

BTTT!


34 posted on 01/15/2005 11:38:59 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

This is the best summary of the whitewash that I have read.


35 posted on 01/15/2005 11:42:51 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

The panel was likely directed to whitewash the scandal precisely BECAUSE if they had reached the same crystal clear conclusion as everybody else - - that political bias was the reason that CBS used forged military documents to try to fix a national election - - then there would be no way for CBS to avoid a criminal investigation.

The report was, in fact, carefully crafted to SHIELD the network. In too-clever-by-half fashion, all aspects of the report which did not deal with the forgeries and the political agenda were beefed up to make the report look "hard-hitting" and "devastating", etc. Concurrent with the release of the report, CBS then lowered the boom on some hapless underlings (while giving a pass to Rather and Heyward) in order to further show the world how "serious" they were.

No wonder Heyward's "weeks, not months" turned into four months - - there was a mountain of careful parsing and legal work involved in crafting a suitable whitewash.


36 posted on 01/15/2005 11:57:37 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"Rather informed the Panel that he still believes the content of the documents is true because 'the facts are right on the money,' and that no one had provided persuasive evidence that the documents were not authentic."

!

Sorry, SeeBS, even the "story" the phony documents are supposed to be about is phony 
____________________________

Find an overview of the FACTS about GWB's Texas Air National Guard Service at http://www.hillnews.com/york/090904.aspx

A summary of the salient points are at  http://boortz.com/nuze/200409/09152004.html#guard

STAUDT FINALLY SURFACES: DUBYA DID NOT GET SPECIAL TREATMENT AND "SUGAR COATING" WAS NEVER REQUESTED BY ANYBODY.  See both
http://snipurl.com/95ad  and  http://snipurl.com/9bny

Ed Morrisey, the guy who swore W into the TANG weighs in here:  http://www.thedailytimes.com/sited/story/html/173996   (the paper's front page is at  http://www.thedailytimes.com/  )

Find this:  "The Air Force, in their ultimate wisdom, assembled a group of 102's [F-102 pilots] and took them to Southeast Asia. Bush volunteered to go.  But he needed to have 500 [flight] hours, but he only had just over 300 hours so he wasn't eligible to go,” Morrisey recalls. ... Despite that, Lieutenant Bush stayed busy. ... "He flew in active air defense missions, training missions.    Day, night, regardless of inclement weather," Morrisey says. ... Colonel Morrisey assured us that to the best of his knowledge Lieutenant Bush was treated like any other officer in the Texas Air National Guard. ... Morrisey says he considers himself to be more of a Libertarian than Republican or Democrat.  Nonetheless, Morrisey says he is voting for George Bush come election day. -- in BOTH printable version AND video clip at   http://www.volunteertv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2346701

See what Dubya's Wing Men (NOT boaters or yachtsmen, now, but FELLOW FIGHTER PILOTS) had to say (they were not in the SAME supersonic fighter plane with him, but they DID SERVE WITH HIM AND FLEW ALONGSIDE HIM) here: http://snipurl.com/6qkp

A Commentary by Col. John H. Wambough, Jr. USAF (Ret.) is at:  http://jb-williams.com/guest-kerry.htm

Major General Hodges says GWB didn't get preferential treatment, didn't need any, and besides, he's mad at CBS for misleading him here:  http://snipurl.com/a3y2

4 Eyewitnesses who saw GWB serving in Alabama are quoted and sourced HERE: http://snipurl.com/a3y3

See Exactly WHERE George W. Bush's TANG service fits in The REALLY Big Picture here:  http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=3919

And don't forget, IT WAS GWB who signed the Standard Form 180 asking that ALL his military records be released and JFK who DID NOT.  Physical exams were irrelevant to someone like GWB who'd already taken physicals and flown for 3 years and no more flying was required (on top of that, the F-102 had started to be phased out anyway); they were never considered worth writing him up for except in the FAKE memos, the source of which SeeBS refuses to identify.  The attitude of SeeBS and everyone who sided with them seems to be that it's OK to plant evidence if you think -- or at least hope -- someone's guilty.

"In Texas in the late sixties and early seventies, it was so Democratic that no Republican had enough pull to have a parking ticket fixed [let alone get someone into the National Guard]." -- Robert, Lubbock, TX -- email to Fox NewsWatch, 9-18-04

Besides, Daddy Bush (GHWB) was only a junior Republican U.S. Congressman at the time and had absolutely NO influence in the LBJ/Barnes-dominated state government in Austin.   THE reason they took W was because the Texas Air National Guard didn't have enough applicants to be pilots at the time, while almost all the other services did.

Bush served HONORABLY, with multiple links HERE:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1230803/posts

"The [Texas Air National Guard] records released Tuesday also include orders for an August 1971 training mission in Canada, where Bush impressed his commanders. An evaluation written nine months later said Bush's 'skills as an interceptor pilot enabled him to complete all his ADC (Air Defense Command) intercept missions during the Canadian deployment with ease'." -- The Wichita Eagle, 10-5-04

Kerry's questions are answered here:  http://snipurl.com/a71g

This whole SeeBS fiasco was based on such an irrelevant non-story from the git-go that one can only presume there was a complete breakdown, or even lack, of standards and possibly, even malice aforethought, especially if you review the timeline of the SeeBS fiasco here:
http://snipurl.com/a3y6

Golly, it would have been nice to say, well, they both were irresponsible kids who got away with really, really bad stuff, but hell, it's all water over the dam, etc.  EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT IT TURNS OUT IF W GOT INTO ANY MISCHIEF, IT HAD NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH WHAT THEY'VE TRIED TO FRAME HIM FOR.  The NYTimes' and Flim Flam Dan Rather's claims that yes, the memos are fake, but what they say is true -- amounts to saying it's OK to fabricate and plant evidence if you think -- or at least hope --  someone's guilty.

As far as the documents go, their fraudulence is demonstrated here: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog   and here: http://snipurl.com/9cvj
See what a REAL Texas Air National Guard document from the '70s looks like HERE: http://www.geocities.com/bush_not_awol/document40.html

The latest attempt to prove the phony memos are "real" (this time by Utah Professor David Hailey), is shown to be yet ANOTHER fraud here:  http://wizbangblog.com/archives/003851.php

The Texas forgery code provides that publication of two or more fake government documents is a felony.  Follow the updates on CBS's tampering with the evidence in this crime HERE:  http://snipurl.com/9eqw   Further, there may have been a criminal conspiracy to use forged documents in an attempt to influence a Presidential election, a federal crime.

-- all from  http://freedomkeys.com/w-tangfacts.htm 


37 posted on 01/15/2005 12:05:37 PM PST by FreeKeys (Obviously, SeeBS thinks it's OK to plant "evidence" if you think, or at least hope, someone's guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

http://snipurl.com/c1iu is the page where ABC moved its report on STAUDT denying special treatment for W.


38 posted on 01/15/2005 12:32:16 PM PST by FreeKeys (Obviously, SeeBS thinks it's OK to plant "evidence" if you think, or at least hope, someone's guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys
TDT Logo
Friday, September 24, 2004 

Col. Ed Morrisey Jr., Air National Guard (retired), answers questions Thursday at the Blount County Library about President Bush's entry into the Texas Air National Guard in 1968. - 09-24-2004 
Iva Butler /The Daily Times 

Man who swore Bush into Air Guard speaks out

2004-09-24
by Lance Coleman
of The Daily Times Staff

Ed Morrisey Jr. has his opinion about rumors President Bush received preferential treatment when he was allowed into the Texas Air National Guard in the late 1960s.

The Blount Countian also has firsthand knowledge.

The 75-year-old Jackson Hills resident is a retired colonel with Texas Air National Guard. He swore Lt. George W. Bush into the service in May 1968.

On Thursday, Morrisey said the argument that Bush got off easy by being in the National Guard doesn't take into consideration the context of the 1960s.

``Bush and the others were flying several flights day or night over the Gulf of Mexico to identify the unknown,'' he said. ``The Cold War was a nervous time. You never knew. There were other things going on equally important to the country, and the Air National Guard had a primary role in it.''

Morrisey said the commander he worked for at the unit in Texas was sent there to rebuild the image of the unit. There were only two to four pilot training slots given to them per year, he said. Individuals questioned by an evaluation board and then chosen by the commander had to be the best.

``Bush was selected and he turned out just fine,'' he said.

According to Morrisey, after Bush began working as a fighter pilot, he became regarded as one of the best pilots there. Unit commander Col. Maurice Udell considered Bush to be one of his top five pilots, Morrisey said.

``The kid did good,'' he said.

Each pilot had to perform alert duty where they patrolled for unidentified aircraft during the threat of the Cold War, Morrisey said.

``Bush Jr. did good for us,'' Morrisey said. ``He pulled alert and he did it all.''

Morrisey said that while Bush didn't get preferential treatment, not everyone was allowed into the National Guard.

``We wanted the best we could get. We never knowingly took an unworthy individual in the units I belonged to,'' he said. ``You're only as good your worst individual.''

This isn't the first time a reporter called Morrisey asking whether or not Bush received preferential treatment. Shortly after Republicans nominated Bush for president in 2000, a reporter from Texas called Morrisey.

``That floored me. The only people that got preferential treatment was when Jimmy Carter pardoned those guys that went to Canada,'' he said of individuals who fled to Canada to avoid the draft during the war in Vietnam.

Speaking of the controversy surrounding Bush's Guard service during the Vietnam era, Morrisey said: ``I think it's tragic. I think real people can filter through this. At least I hope so.''

Morrisey said he agreed with Bush's work as president and supported the administration's aggressive stance toward fighting terrorism and the war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

``We've got to eliminate terrorists,'' he said. ``Let's get them where they're living instead of them getting my grandkids and great-grandkids here.''

Morrisey worked as the executive officer of the 147th Fighter Group from February of 1967 to July of 1968. From Texas he came to Alcoa where he was the first commandant of the Noncommissioned Officer Academy at McGhee Tyson Air National Guard Base. He also was ``dedicated to the development'' of the Air National Guard Leadership School and the Officer Preparatory Academy to commission Air Guard officers.

He was commandant for all three schools and became the first commander of the I.G. Brown Professional Military Education Center.

Morrisey has been involved in the community, including being a former member of the Blount Chamber of Commerce, president of the Maryville Kiwanis Club, Blount County Boys Club board member and on the ALCOA Scholarship Selection Committee. 


-- from  http://www4.thedailytimes.com/  9-24-2004

39 posted on 01/15/2005 12:49:21 PM PST by FreeKeys (Obviously, SeeBS thinks it's OK to plant "evidence" if you think, or at least hope, someone's guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FreeKeys

The VOLUMINOUS files fisking the SeeBS documents at LGF have been moved here: http://snipurl.com/c1k0


40 posted on 01/15/2005 1:21:11 PM PST by FreeKeys (Obviously, SeeBS thinks it's OK to plant "evidence" if you think, or at least hope, someone's guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson