"You said atheists tended to be neurotic, stupid et al."
Neurotic and stupid are different things. I did NOT say you are stupid. Read my frickin' post!
As for neurotic, why else would you be carrying on this desperate defense of your "normality" depsite lack of faith in things unseen? It isn't worth the candle, really.
But you have some kind of abnormal need to defend yourself against an accusation I didn't even make.
That's neurotic. Live with it. It isn't fatal.
First off I'd like to apologize to you (hinkley buzzard) for not alerting you to that last reply of mine #97, as it directly related to you. That is a low behind the back kind of jab. Though I didn't intend it to be such, and worded it in general, without mentioning you specifically by name, it was still wrong not alerting you. Thankyou for alerting me in your reply #113, which caused me to see my error. I am sorry.
No doubt about it hinkley buzzard, you are quite correct that you did not call Melas "stupid." Melas, you are wrong in #102 saying that he did. But, hinkley buzzard, you were wrong in #75 by saying; "I didn't say you were hateful or stupid." Thereby implying that Melas in #67 had accused you of saying that which you did not say. Melas did not accuse you of saying it.
Both of you made errors. Now lets get back to the name calling and insults. By the way hinckley buzzard, your launching psycho babble insults on atheists would be an immediate defeat to you almost anywhere but here at FR. The dishonest atheists, long ago developed and continuely refined those arguments. They got a head start on the dishonesty. The only reason such phony arguments might work for you here at FR, is because if the Atheists try using them in return, effectively, they will get banned.
As for me, I enjoy seeing atheist dishonestly insulted. It a nice change from the usual opposite I hear all the time. And I am an atheist.