Replies

"You assumed that he wrote notes on his leg ..."

For the second time, I did not assume he wrote notes on his leg. That was reported in the news.

"which logically implies that other cops in such circumstances would do the same."

What kind of convoluted logic implies that?

"you seem to be beefing that Tom Coleman was punished at all"

Tom Coleman? You mean Texas' "Outstanding Lawman of the Year" for his work in Tulia? That Tom Coleman?

I said he was railroaded. I said he was scapegoated. I said it was political correctness at work.

He was found guilty of perjury in a 2003 trial because he testified that an incident happened in August five years before, when it was actually July. An incident totally unrelated to his work in Tulia which began a year later.

You assumed that he wrote notes on his leg [ROBERTPAULSEN'S DECEPTIVE DELETION RESTORED:] simply because "he was a white law enforcement officer operating undercover, without backup, buying drugs in a black neighborhood, who would have been executed had he been found out,"

For the second time, I did not assume he wrote notes on his leg. That was reported in the news.

Your dishonesty knows no bounds.

which logically implies that other cops in such circumstances would do the same.

What kind of convoluted logic implies that?

It's straightforward logic; if anyone but you professes not to understand it, I'll eat my hat.