You can probably cite those contradictions more than most. As you probably know, one theory was that the Powell contradictions were a deliberate ploy by a unified executive branch. I would love to see evidence either way that would clarify what was going on in the case of those contradictions.
I looked for one, but couldn't find it. If a transcript turns up, I'll ping you.
Yes, please do. Thanks.
You'll never see the evidence either way. I reject that theory based on my view of GWB as a relatively straight shooter, and the well known pro Arab (Saudi) bias of the State Dept. They need jobs when they retire. On balance I think Powell did a decent job, particularly on Iraq, but he didn't address what I perceive as a major problem, restructuring State as a department fullly in accord with administration policies. Big job for Condi.
href=javascript:getStaticMedia('/me/20050114_me_armitage','RM,WM');
or the link at
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4283976
Coming from someone who isn’t a great fan of Powell, the AP take is complete BS. It’s based on piecing together quotes from less than a minute of the interview.
If you don’t listen, it’s mostly about Iraq, my take, we’re winning.
He admits he and Powell won't be missed, and the nation won't miss a beat because of it. And that infighting, as between Powell and Rumsfeld, is part of a vital governmental process. Say's nothing about it being public.
One great quote
Being responsible involves pissing people off.