To: scory
Or if the kid had attacked them with a knife or something and they had killed him in self defense they could have gotten life.
British law is a travesty. Ours isn't far behind.
The child attacking them is an utterly irrelevant nonsense, and for your information killing in self-defence does not warrant any punishment under English law.
What happened here is that the charge of murder (which carries a mandatory life-sentence) was not proved (this was the decision of the jury), and only the lesser crime of manslaughter (which tends to attract sentences in this region).
I agree that the period is far to short in this case (from what I can see), but it was the jury's decision to aquit on murder.
35 posted on
01/14/2005 1:01:30 PM PST by
tjwmason
("For he himself has said it, And it's greatly to his credit, That he is an Englishman!")
To: tjwmason
What about Anthony Martin? He was defending his property and probably his life, he was put in prison in England.
52 posted on
01/14/2005 1:25:37 PM PST by
Vor Lady
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson