Posted on 01/14/2005 7:57:27 AM PST by madprof98
bookmark and ping for later discussion
I think that you are trying to get across that you are a "anti-spitball" liberal.
NY doesn't define marraige.
New Paltz and it's mayor will marry gays and lesbians.
The rest of your example can't be too far behind.
The rest of the state tends to say that while marraige isn't defined, they simply will not marry certain groups until a decision is made.
*shrugs*
As they say here Ithaca is the city of Evil.
And New Paltz isn't far behind.
Gosh! Am I in the wrong place? I am just and ordinary Republican just wanting to learn and debate with like minded individuals. I am not hate filled or whacked out or anything. I might be too boring for you all.
Bostock is a completely neurotic homo activist. He has even written articles describing his mental ailments. He is an idiot of the highest order. Creative Loafing has become such a liberal rag that I can no longer read it. Even music reviews have a left-wing bias.
BTW I feel so famous now that one of my replies finally made Creative Loafing! The only thing better would be if John 'I hate the chimp' Sugg himself started bashing me.
Correction - Your post will simply be deleted zotted.
He's a psychoanalyst in the Freudian mold. Wow. I'm impressed!
I was shocked, SHOCKED, to discover that fact about myself and my FRiends here.
I mean, it must be fact: it was in Creative Loafing.
LOLOLOL!!!! Good one,you wing-nut!! :)
http://www.pacifica.edu/dp_phd_humanities.html
So I click that link and get...
The term depth psychology evokes many associations and images yet is often difficult to define. In this course we formulate a definition of our field by investigating historical, cultural, and conceptual traditions that shape its identity. Topics include ancient approaches to healing, encounters with the unconscious, and soul-making through literature and mythology. Overviews of Freudian, Jungian, and archetypal psychology are provided, as well as ideas regarding depth psychologys future in the new millennium.
...and so I STILL don't know what it is. What's the old adage? "To know is to define". They admit in the very first sentence that they can't even define it, and then proceed to link a bunch of convoluted touchy-feely concepts linked only by only the most tenuous and circular definition. This doesn't qualify as "depth" anything -- there's not even a surface for crying out loud. I suspect that if you actually investigate this field of study a better title might be "How to hate straight white males better because we are frothing at the mouth heterophobes".
Mr. "P"iled "h"igh and "D"eep is simply using big lie theory. It does not matter that FR is fair and logical. His homosexual perspective requires the public to disregard FR because it is a danger to his homo-worldview. Thus the lie about kkk and birch society.
Goebles would be proud of his fellow "sister."
Yet another clown in need of a sledgehammer to the head.
Even though I find myself commenting about his "never leave your buddy's behind" lifestyle, it's patently obvious that this guy gets an apparently much-needed ego boost by reading the responses to his drivel. And here we go, indulging his sick little mind.
What a shame. He is a nice looking man.
Or Phishing Democrat!
"He types with a lisp."
Wrong! "He typth with a lipth" is the proper way to put it.
It's "Impugn" you idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.