Skip to comments.
King would have supported gay 'marriage,' (Commie) ex-aide says
Washington Times ^
| 1/14/05
| Robert Stacy McCain
Posted on 01/13/2005 10:18:41 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
01/13/2005 10:18:41 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
I don't know why, but this story makes me ROFLMAO!
2
posted on
01/13/2005 10:20:28 PM PST
by
Hildy
( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
To: kattracks
I don't agree that King would accepted gay marriage.
In face, the dems won't mention it, but a lot of black Baptists voted for Bush because of the gay marriage and abortion issues.
3
posted on
01/13/2005 10:22:29 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
To: kattracks
and John F. Kennedy would have supported adultery laws.
4
posted on
01/13/2005 10:22:58 PM PST
by
Andy from Beaverton
(I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
To: kattracks
Well of course King was homosexual. He was trying to emulate his hero Lincoln.
(I'll bet this thesis would get someone a book deal nowadays).
5
posted on
01/13/2005 10:23:32 PM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: kattracks
I don't think so. When the Gay guy down the street gets into his $55,000 dollar Mercedes and drives away from his $400,000 dollar condo and complains he just doesn't have any rights...makes me wanna barf.
6
posted on
01/13/2005 10:24:41 PM PST
by
Dallas59
("A weak peace is worse than war" - Tacitcus)
To: Andy from Beaverton
John F. Kennedy would have supported adultery laws Kennedy was gay. All that fooling around with Monroe or whomever rumor was cover up.
(another book deal).
7
posted on
01/13/2005 10:24:56 PM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
Speaking of King's "Christian commitment to a socially conscious democracy," former Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) activist Jack O'Dell asked, "Why would he exclude people because of their sexual preference?" " He may not have have excluded gays
But he also wouldn't have condoned the gay life style
9
posted on
01/13/2005 10:25:48 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: kattracks
Martin Luther King Jr. would have supported same-sex "marriage," I believe Mr. O'Dell is correct. I think it would be fitting if we combine the MLK birthday celebration with Gay and Lesbian Day.
10
posted on
01/13/2005 10:25:58 PM PST
by
Cowboy Bob
(Fraud is the lifeblood of the Democratic Party)
To: Hildy
Gee, I don't know why. I think it's highly edifying to know that the Washington Times is taking seriously the statements of a senile, expatriate, communist flunky.
/TIC
11
posted on
01/13/2005 10:26:18 PM PST
by
shibumi
(Sum Ergo Flatulo)
To: kattracks
12
posted on
01/13/2005 10:26:23 PM PST
by
expatguy
(http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
To: kattracks
And he might have given up working for civil rights to pursue video games full time with the advent of the Atari. We'll never know; he's dead...
To: blahdeblah
Who the hell cares what he would've thought? Are you gay?
...because if you are I think you could get a book deal writing about who you think was gay.
14
posted on
01/13/2005 10:30:19 PM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: kattracks
Gee Whiz, maybe We should drop the charges against Mikey Jackson!
To: kattracks
16
posted on
01/13/2005 10:38:56 PM PST
by
Apercu
("Rep ipsa loquitor")
To: Hildy
---I don't know why, but this story makes me ROFLMAO!---
It's funny stuff, that's why! :^)
---Mr. O'Dell, 81, now an international affairs consultant to the National Rainbow Coalition, was dismissed from the staff of King's SCLC after a June 1963 White House meeting during which President Kennedy urged the civil rights leader to purge communists from his organization.---
17
posted on
01/13/2005 10:40:41 PM PST
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: kattracks
"The homosexual rights movement is 'another dimension of the struggle for human rights'...."
So with the same "logic" one must conclude Dr. King would be pro-life? For without question the struggle for an unborn chlid to escape its murderous parents and procedure provider and simply live is "another dimension of the struggle for human rights...."
18
posted on
01/13/2005 10:59:16 PM PST
by
Chummy
(Liberals -- the other Red meat.)
To: Hildy
I don't know why, but this story makes me ROFLMAO! The funny thing is, O'Dell has gone from being pro-Soviet to being pro-Canadian without ever once altering his anti-Americanism!
19
posted on
01/13/2005 11:12:13 PM PST
by
Madstrider
(The right wing conspiracy isn't really so vast -- we just work overtime)
To: Madstrider
To wit:
Mr. O'Dell remained a staunch defender of communism for decades. At a 1985 event in Berkeley, Calif., on the 68th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution, Mr. O'Dell called U.S. opposition to the Soviet Union "an integral part of the belief system of racism and Western national chauvinism."
Last night, Mr. O'Dell condemned the United States for its "aggressive militarism," and called for a "new Reconstruction" to eliminate economic inequality.
A Detroit native who now lives in Vancouver, British Columbia, Mr. O'Dell said Canada is ahead of the United States in creating the kind of society King advocated.
"Canada has a socially conscious democracy not as advanced as Europe, but way ahead of the United States," he said.
20
posted on
01/13/2005 11:17:33 PM PST
by
Madstrider
(The right wing conspiracy isn't really so vast -- we just work overtime)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson