The recovering hippie misunderstood what I was trying to say.
My daughter's boyfriend say President Bush deserves the biggest blow out in history. And he says the rest of his buddies say the same thing.
I wasn't suggesting we poll the military and then decide. I think you probably understood what I meant.
Why is everyone so threatened with a "discussion" of different views? The discussion seemed to bring out some really good reasons why we Should have a big party. If the out come of the discussion is that "yes, its a great idea and here's why", wonderful. Then we get even more positives about why an Inauguration party is meaningful.
No one has yet to address my whole point: A discussion on pros and cons is a good idea and that people can have differing opinions and don't have to get slammed.
I guess my name "Recovering Ex Hippie" just evokes such an emotional reaction its hard to read my posts with detachment.
Get over it., or ask David Horowitz what it means.