[Thinkin' Gal]

Nothing that a DNA test won't fix.

Oh, surely the palace has known the truth for years. I meant the public opinion. If Harry is really Charles' son, what are the royals supposed to say? They'd be admitting that they weren't sure, and thus snagged some DNA because after all, Diana got around. Poor kid! And would anyone believe them? Probably not. If he isn't Charles', then they can't very well announce that, either.

I am suspicious like a lot of people, but if Harry is Hewitt's kid, Charles has known for years. At least he's being the dad.

I wonder if a lot of Harry's problems are because he thinks he's Hewitt's kid (true or not), and Hewitt is denying it. And living with those Windsor-Hanover mutants has got to make anybody loony. If he's as short-changed in the mental department as many think, then he's doubly cursed.

[AMDG&BVMH]

"Charles has known for years. At least he's being the dad."

Quite, as they might say. Traditionally, the husband has been legally and socially the father of any child borne by his wife during their marriage. Cuckolded or not . . .

[I guess you could say Hanoverian rather than Windsor-Hanover, since Windsor was a made-up name to avoid the German-sounding connection of the royal family. The British, of course, eliminated the German royalty at the end of WW I, but for some odd reason which I cannot fathom, kept their own . . . ]

[Lijahsbubbe]